R (on the application of Northumbria Police Authority) v Broome

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Neutral Citation[2005] EWHC 2644 (Admlty)
Date2005
Year2005
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Admiralty)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 cases
  • David Ian Sharp v The Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police The Police Medical Appeal Board (Interested Party)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 7 March 2016
    ...in accepting the guidance in these paragraphs. 41 The meaning of "infirmity" in reg A12(5) was considered by Bennett J in R (Northumbria Police Authority) v Broome [2006] ICR 555. Bennett J held that a vulnerability to anxiety was neither a disease nor an injury nor a condition recognised ......
  • R Sidwell v Police Medical Appeal Board The Chief Constable of the Derbyshire Constabulary (Interested Party)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 29 January 2015
    ...medical condition and not to a putative one which the claimant is vulnerable to suffer from at some point in the future ( R (Northumbria Police Authority) v Broome [2006] ICR 555). Further, and unsurprisingly, it has been held that a medical condition has to be one recognised by medicine ( ......
  • S Coleman v Sytner Group Ltd: 2601262/2020
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • 20 February 2021
    ...impair the discharge of its core duty to hear and determine the case in accordance the law and evidence. (71) Hart v English Heritage 2006 ICR 555, EAT, case management decisions are not final I shall address first the respondent’s argument that this claim cannot be brought at all because t......
  • Mr D Wearn v Sainsburys Supermarkets Ltd: 2600360/2020
    • United Kingdom
    • Employment Tribunal
    • 17 March 2022
    ...with the law and the evidence — see Price v Surrey County Council and anor EAT 0450/10; c. as was recognised in Hart v English Heritage 2006 ICR 555, EAT, case management decisions are not final decisions. They can therefore be revisited and reconsidered, for example if there is a material ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT