R (on the Application of Birmingham City Council) v Birmingham Crown Court, RR (Interested Party); R (on the Application of South Gloucestershire District Council) v Bristol Crown Court, AW (by his Litigation Friend) and NW (by his Litigation Friend) (Interested Parties)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date2010
Year2010
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 cases
  • Earl Hodge Applicant v The Governor of the Territory of the Virgin Islands Respondent
    • British Virgin Islands
    • High Court (British Virgin Islands)
    • 5 July 2013
    ...of each of those authorities is that it is open to the Secretary of State to respond to abuse by refusing to return the fugitive. 19 [2010] 1 WLR 1287 (QBD) 20 [2003] 1 WLR 1980 21 [1994] 1 AC 531 22 R v Director of Public Prosecutions ex parte Manning and Another [2001] QB 320 23 The ......
  • Earl Hodge Applicant v The Governor of the Territory of the Virgin Islands Respondent
    • British Virgin Islands
    • High Court (British Virgin Islands)
    • 5 July 2013
    ...of each of those authorities is that it is open to the Secretary of State to respond to abuse by refusing to return the fugitive. 19 [2010] 1 WLR 1287 20 [2003] 1 WLR 1980 21 [1994] 1 AC 531 22 R v Director of Public Prosecutions ex parte Manning and Another [2001] QB 320 23 The Times,......
  • R(YT) JR 2248 2012
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
    • 23 April 2013
    ...injuries compensation) the appeal lies of right and without permission: R (Birmingham City Council) v Crown Court at Birmingham [2010] 1 WLR 1287 at 3.6 CICA’s argument on this first point is that CPR 3.9 was introduced to consolidate, clarify and replace the case law relating to the exerci......
  • Aidan Richard Sherry v The Queen
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 4 March 2013
    ...in concentrating upon the reasons for the delay. In R (Birmingham City Council) v Crown Court at Birmingham [2009] EWHC 3329 (Admin), [2010] 1 WLR 1287, paras 25 and 52, for example, the Divisional Court held that the relevant criteria for extending time were the merits of the appeal, the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • SHAPING A COMMON LAW DUTY TO GIVE REASONS IN SINGAPORE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2016, December 2016
    • 1 December 2016
    ...Ltd v Seatrans Shipping Corp [2002] 1 WLR 2397 at [15]. 74 R (on the Application of Birmingham City Council) v Birmingham Crown Court [2010] 1 WLR 1287 at [46]. 75 c 53 (UK). 76 Tribunals and Inquiries Act 1992 (c 53) (UK) Sch 1, s 10. 77 Tribunals and Inquiries Act 1992 (c 53) (UK) s 10(2)......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT