R (on the application of Gourlay) v Parole Board
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Neutral Citation | [2020] UKSC 50 |
| Court | Supreme Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
R v Maughan and Another
...Scotland. In England and Wales sentencing policy is shared by statute between the Court of Appeal and the Sentencing Council. 13 In R (Gourlay) v Parole Board [2020] UKSC 50; [2020] 1 WLR 5344 and CPRE Kent v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2021] UKSC 36; [2021]......
-
R (Gulrez) v Redbridge LBC
...in receipt of public funding. It would have been wrong in principle to take any account of public funding ( R (Gourlay) v Parole Board [2020] 1 WLR 5344 at ...
-
The King (on the application of Halton Borough Council) v Road User Charging Adjudicators
...“choosing … to maintain … impartiality and … let the reasons which it gave speak for themselves”: R (Gourlay) v Parole Board [2020] UKSC 50 [2020] 1 WLR 5344 at §46. They acted just like any public authority actively defending a judicial review claim. They did not take a “neutral position......
-
Petition Of Oa Against Secretary Of State For The Home Department
...counsel made reference to various passages in the Court of Appeal decisions mentioned earlier and also to R (Gourlay) v Parole Board [2020] UKSC 50. In respect of a UK wide scheme it would be preferable if a common approach was taken on both sides of the border. [8] In a short reply Mr Cask......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Re-Opening Refusals Of Permission To Appeal: One Jurisdiction Or Two? CRAFT v Pope & Cann
...decisions that sought to limit the Court's power to re-open CPR rule 52.30 are not binding (relying on R (Gourlay) v Parole Board [2020] UKSC 50 at [37]) and were, in any event, wrongly Despite acknowledging the ingenuity of the Appellant's submissions, the Court of Appeal considered that t......