R (on the application of Z and another) v Hackney London Borough Council and another
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Neutral Citation | [2020] UKSC 40 |
| Year | 2020 |
| Court | Supreme Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
28 cases
-
Masudur Rahman v Dewan Raisul Hassan
...significant error of principle in reaching a conclusion or reached a conclusion which should not have been reached,: R(Z) v Hackney LBC [2020] 1 WLR 4327, [56], [74], SC. Grounds of appeal 12 In written submissions, the defendants put forward in substance eight grounds of appeal. In summar......
-
Imperium Trustees (Jersey) Ltd v Jersey Competent Authority and another
...case, it is necessary to focus on the effect of the 2018 Law as applied to Imperium's case. In R (Z) v Hackney London Borough Council [2020] UKSC 40; [2020] 1 WLR 4327 Lord Sales explained (at para 114) with regard to section 3 of the United Kingdom Human Rights Act 1998 (the equivalent p......
-
The King (on the application of Carly Jayne Willott) v Eastbourne Borough Council
...in the absence of a residual discretion: R(Z) v Hackney London Borough Council [2019] PTSR 2272, CA [84], approved in the Supreme Court [2020] UKSC 40 [77]ff. As to the caselaw upon which Mr Bano relied: a. In Holley, the Court of Appeal had considered that it did not need to decide the iss......
-
The Motherhood Plan v HM Treasury
...[2013] 1 WLR 1911; R (R) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police [2018] UKSC 47, [2018] 1 WLR 4079; R (Z) v Hackney London Borough Council [2020] UKSC 40, [2020] 1 WLR 4327. In the Hackney case, the Supreme Court endorsed the approach advocated by Lewison LJ in the Court of Appeal ( ......
Get Started for Free