R (on the application of Z and another) v Hackney London Borough Council and another
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Neutral Citation | [2020] UKSC 40 |
| Year | 2020 |
| Court | Supreme Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
18 cases
-
Taylor (Ryan's) Application for Judicial Review
...see R (Ahmad) v Newham LBC ([2009] UKHL 14 [2009]) 3 All ER 755 §§15, 22, 46-47, 59-62 as recently affirmed in R (Z) v Hackney LBC ([2020] UKSC 40) [2020] 1 WLR 4327 §§83-84. [B] Housing Benefit [34] Housing Benefit is a social security benefit which is paid by the NIHE, on behalf the DfC t......
-
Taylor, Ryan and The Department for Communities and The Department for Work and Pensions - Judgement No.2
...passages and their status of judicial minority as regards the outcome. Furthermore, these passages were adopted fully in Z v Hackney LBC [2020] UKSC 40 at para [85] ff. [59] In their extensive treatise of the issue of “bright line rules” in cases involving differential treatment, Lords Sump......
-
Anthony James Broom v Maria Del Pilar Molina Aguilar
...as though it was a piece of legislation or a contract.” 40 As to evaluative judgments, in the Supreme Court in R(Z) v Hackney LBC [2020] 1 WLR 4327, [56], [74], Lord Sales (with whom Lords Reed, Kerr and Kitchin agreed) endorsed the view of Lewison LJ in the court below. This was that the ......
-
The King (on the application of Carly Jayne Willott) v Eastbourne Borough Council
...in the absence of a residual discretion: R(Z) v Hackney London Borough Council [2019] PTSR 2272, CA [84], approved in the Supreme Court [2020] UKSC 40 [77]ff. As to the caselaw upon which Mr Bano relied: a. In Holley, the Court of Appeal had considered that it did not need to decide the is......
Request a trial to view additional results