R.P.C. Holdings Ltd v Rogers

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1953
Year1953
CourtChancery Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
17 cases
  • Cargill v Gotts
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 18 December 1980
    ... ... James (1867) LH 2CP 311 at 580 and applied in RPC Holdings Limited v. Rogers (1953) 1 AER 1029 ... The principle is that "when a right of way to a ... ...
  • Mills and Another v Silver and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 6 July 1990
    ...followed by the plaintiffs was that approved by Harman J, on the then Rules of the Supreme Court, in R.P.C. Holdings Ltd. v. Rogers [1953] 1 All ER 1029 at 1036 4What is left therefore is a claim by the appellants to a private right of way by prescription with vehicles over the disputed tr......
  • Loose v Lynn Shellfish Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 13 April 2016
    ...period when it was not enjoyed) would suffice to establish a prescriptive right — see eg Aynsley v Glover (1875) 10 ChApp 1023 and RCP Holdings Ltd v Rogers [1953] 1 A11ER 1029. However, such a claim could be defeated where it could be proved that the origin of the enjoyment must have been ......
  • Gallagher v Rainbow
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • Don't Lose Your Way! 3 Misunderstood Aspects Of The Law Of Rights Of Way
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 28 August 2021
    ...Where a right of way is acquired by user, the extent of the grant must be measured by the extent of the user. RPC Holdings v Rogers [1953] 1 All E.R. 1029; right way over golf course to plaintiff's field; right had been used for agricultural purposes but intended use was for access to camps......
  • Don't Lose Your Way! 3 Misunderstood Aspects Of The Law Of Rights Of Way
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 28 August 2021
    ...Where a right of way is acquired by user, the extent of the grant must be measured by the extent of the user. RPC Holdings v Rogers [1953] 1 All E.R. 1029; right way over golf course to plaintiff's field; right had been used for agricultural purposes but intended use was for access to camps......