R (THE GARDEN and LEISURE GROUP Ltd) and NORTH SOMERSET COUNCIL and Mr R VANDERPLANK
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Neutral Citation | [2003] EWHC 1605 (Admin) |
Date | 2003 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
R (on the application of Millgate Developments Ltd) v Wokingham BC
...case, and also on the decision of Richards J in R (on the application of the Garden and Leisure Group Ltd) v North Somerset Council [2003] EWHC 1605 (Admin), in support of the proposition that an application does not require that the obligation continues to serve its original purpose. The t......
-
R Mansfield District Council v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government
...a planning purpose. The Renaissance Habitat case was the key case cited in R (The Garden & Leisure Group Ltd) v N Somerset Council [2003] EWHC 1605 (Admin) where is was accepted (para 28) that the correct approach to considering an application under section 106A of the 1990 Act was to ask f......
-
R Millgate Development Ltd v Wokingham Borough Council
...Those issues were considered by Richards J in The Queen (The Garden and Leisure Group Limited) v North Somerset District Council [2003] EWHC 1605 (Admin), paragraphs 28 to 29 and 46, and Ouseley J in Renaissance Habitat Limited v West Berkshire District Council [2007] EWHC 242 (Admin). I ......
-
(1) Alice Mae Coe (2) Annie Multon (3) Ezmie Smith (4) Betty Ebanks Plaintiffs/Appellants v (1) The Governor of The Cayman Islands (2) Attorney General of The Cayman Islands (3) Minister for Finance, District Administration, Works, Lands & Agriculture (4) National Roads Authority (Nra) (5) Dart Realty (Cayman) Ltd Defendants/Respondents
...any event been no amendment. 65 Mr Akiwumi's second authority,R (The Garden and Leisure Group Ltd) v. North Somerset Council [2003] EWHC 1605 (Admin), was cited to invoke the ‘useful purpose’ test. It concerned an attempt by one garden centre to thwart the decision in principle by the Counc......
Request a trial to view additional results