R (TP) Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 2019 |
| Neutral Citation | [2019] EWHC 1116 (Admin) |
| Date | 2019 |
| Year | 2019 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Cox's (Lorraine) Application
...case, because in that case there has been no comparable historic failure to pay a benefit. [1310] In the liability judgment in SXC, [2019] EWHC 1116 (Admin), Swift J had found a breach of Article 14 on the basis that “no sufficient explanation had been provided for the difference” in treatm......
-
R TP and AR (TP and AR No.3) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
...benefits payable to members of the Regulation 4A group. 45 On 3 May 2019 Swift J rejected several of the claimants' contentions ( [2019] EWHC 1116 (Admin); [2019] PTSR 2123). But he did accept that the SSWP had failed to provide any justification for the difference in treatment between th......
-
The Queen (on the Application of TP, AR & SXC) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
...for Work and Pensions against the decisions of (i) Mr Justice Lewis(The Times, June 14, 2018; [2019] PTSR 238)and (ii) Mr Justice Swift([2019] PTSR 2123) which allowed claims for judicial review by the claimants, TP and AR in the first case and by TP, AR and SXC in the second case, against ......
-
FL v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (UC)
...ECHR, rejecting the DWP’s arguments to the contrary ([90-91]). 11. Subsequently, in R (On the Application of TP, AR & SXC) v SSWP [2019] EWHC 1116 (Admin) (TP No.2), Swift J helpfully observed (at that Lewis J’s judgment in TP No.1 is authority for two propositions. The first (Proposition 1......
Request a trial to view additional results