R (TP) Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
| Judgment Date | 2019 |
| Neutral Citation | [2019] EWHC 1116 (Admin) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Date | 2019 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
6 cases
-
R TP and AR (TP and AR No.3) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
...legacy benefits payable to members of the Regulation 4A group. 45 On 3 May 2019 Swift J rejected several of the claimants' contentions ( [2019] EWHC 1116 (Admin); [2019] PTSR 2123). But he did accept that the SSWP had failed to provide any justification for the difference in treatment betwe......
-
FL v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Universal Credit)
...ECHR, rejecting the DWP’s arguments to the contrary ([90-91]). 11. Subsequently, in R (On the Application of TP, AR & SXC) v SSWP [2019] EWHC 1116 (Admin) (TP No.2), Swift J helpfully observed (at that Lewis J’s judgment in TP No.1 is authority for two propositions. The first (Proposition 1......
-
Cox's (Lorraine) Application
...case, because in that case there has been no comparable historic failure to pay a benefit. [1310] In the liability judgment in SXC, [2019] EWHC 1116 (Admin), Swift J had found a breach of Article 14 on the basis that “no sufficient explanation had been provided for the difference” in treatm......
-
The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v MJ
...to defend a number of Article 14 claims for precisely this reason. 58. Thus, for example, in R (TP) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2019] EWHC 1116 (Admin), [2019] PTSR 2123 (“TP2”), upheld on appeal, Swift J said “49. … This claim is not directed to the difference in the level ......
Get Started for Free
