R (Tucker) v Director General of the National Crime Squad

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date17 January 2003
Neutral Citation[2003] EWCA Civ 57
Date17 January 2003
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
38 cases
  • R Tony Simpson and Others v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 28 Junio 2013
    ...positions. 24 In support of this submission Ms Ventham relies on the observations of Scott Baker LJ in R (on the application of Tucker) v Director General of the National Crime Squad [2003] IRLR 439 at para 22: "While it is true that the NCS performs an important public function, as do poli......
  • R A v Chief Constable of B Constabulary
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 26 Julio 2012
    ...by this Court, in other words, that it was simply not amenable to judicial review. She relied on R (Tucker) v Director General of the National Crime Squad [2003] EWCA Civ 57, [2003] ICR 599. At paragraphs 24 and 25 the Court of Appeal approved a three stage test set out by Pitchford J (as h......
  • R (on the application of Woods) v Chief Constable of Merseyside Police
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 7 Agosto 2014
    ...is engaged." Therefore it would be wrong for me to discount the fact that D cannot disclose his reasons because of PII considerations. The Tucker Case 21 Mr Tucker was a detective inspector seconded for five years to the National Crime Squad (NCS). Thereafter several officers seconded to ......
  • Jenner Stronge v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 29 Marzo 2021
    ...decisions are open to judicial review (see in this regard R (Tucker) v Director General of the National Crime Squad [2003] EWCA Civ 57; [2003] ICR 599 at para. 32. c. The reasons given by the Defendant for not transferring Bleu to third party kennels in this case include concerns about ret......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • UCTA Sounds the Retreat - Further Developments on Limitation of Liability
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 25 Julio 2003
    ...the reasonableness of agreed liability provisions. SUMMARY In Granville Oil and Chemicals Limited v Davies Turner and Co Limited [2003] EWCA Civ 570, the Court of Appeal held that a standard term requiring a party to bring a claim under the contract within a period of nine months from the d......
1 books & journal articles
  • JUDICIAL REVIEW AND PUBLIC LAW: CHALLENGING THE PRECONCEPTIONS OF A TROUBLED TAXONOMY.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 41 No. 2, December 2017
    • 1 Diciembre 2017
    ...Reform in Greece' (2015) 22 Journal of European Public Policy 295. (155) R (Tucker) v Director General of the National Crime Squad [2003] ICR 599, 605 [13]. It has also been said to depend 'very much on individual cases', with '[n]o hard and fast rule' able to be set down, it being 'very mu......