R v Adams (Denis) (No. 2)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1998 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
R v Tsekiri
...the decision of this court in Sampson and Kelly [2014] EWCA Crim 1968 and the approach suggested by Lord Bingham CJ in Adams (No.) [1998] 1 Cr. App. R. 377 this court allowed the prosecution's appeal against the terminating ruling of the judge at first instance. There was plainly a case for......
-
R v Sally Clark
...expressed in terms of a statistical probability, but legally speaking the exercise is not realistic - see R -v- Denis Adams (No 2) [1998] 1 Cr App R 377, which shows that it is not an exercise the courts would perform. 161 The history of the matter, set out at length at the beginning of thi......
-
R v Ben Belhaj-Farhat
...the decision of this court in Sampson and Kelly [2014] EWCA Crim 1968 and the approach suggested by Lord Bingham CJ in Adams (No.) [1998] 1 Cr App R 377, this court allowed the prosecution's appeal against the terminating ruling of the judge at first instance. There was plainly a case for......
-
Grazettes v The Queen
...R. v. Adams (Denis) [1996] 2 Cr. App. R. 467 at page 481E; and also Doheny and Adams at page 375B and R. v. Adams (Denis) (No. 2) [1998] 1 Cr. App. R. 377 at page 383 to 385. 57 Further, it is important that the DNA evidence be evaluated in the context of the totality of the evidence. Lord ......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 books & journal articles
-
Subject Index
...[2006] BCSC1430 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281R v Adams [1996] 2 Cr App R 467, CA. . 182–183,186, 195, 204R v Adams (No. 2) [1998] 1 Cr App R 377, CA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182,183, 206R vArmstrong (1970) 1CCC (2d) 106. . . . . . . . 298R vArp [1998] 3SC......
-
Relative plausibility and its critics
...recent case of Nulty v. Milton Keynes Borough Council, [2013] EWCA Civ 15. See also (R. v.T. [2010] EWCA Crim 2439) and R v Adams [1998] 1 Cr App R 377.Allen and Pardo 21 legal rule that the plaintiff does not automatically win even when the defendant offers no affirmativecontrary explanati......
-
DNA Evidence Alone as a Case to Answer
...It was clear from the decision in RvSampson and Kelly [2014] EWCA Crim 1968 and theapproach of Lord Bingham CJ in RvAdams (no. 2) [1998] 1 Cr App R 377 that where DNA evidencewas directly deposited in the course of the commission of a crime, a very high DNA match was sufficientCourt of Appe......
-
The Likelihood-Ratio Framework and Forensic Evidence in Court: A Response to R v T
...logically correct subjective use of information inopposition to no logically correct use of information.85 [1996] 2 Cr App R 467.86 [1998] 1 Cr App R 377.87 [1997] 1 Cr App R 369, [1997] Crim LR 669.88 RvT[2010] EWCA Crim 2439, [2011] 1 Cr App R 9 at [46].89 See also Balding, above n. 49 at......
Request a trial to view additional results