R v Adams (Denis)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1996
Date1996
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • DPP v Wilson
    • Ireland
    • Court of Criminal Appeal
    • November 27, 2014
    ...necessary to give to the jury any special warning simply because the only evidence in the case was DNA evidence. 48 In R v. Adams [1996] 2Cr. App. R. 467, the Court of Appeal stated that there was nothing inherent in the nature of DNA evidence which supported the proposition that such evide......
  • Grazettes v The Queen
    • Barbados
    • Court of Appeal (Barbados)
    • September 18, 2008
    ...of a formula, “but by the joint application of their individual common sense and knowledge of the world to the evidence before them”: R. v. Adams (Denis) [1996] 2 Cr. App. R. 467 at page 481E; and also Doheny and Adams at page 375B and R. v. Adams (Denis) (No. 2) [1998] 1 Cr. App. R. 377 at......
  • R v Webster
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • December 11, 2019
    ...App. No. 2/2010 (Ind. 27/2009), December 7th, 2010, dictum of Mottley, J.A. applied. (6)R. v. Adams (No. 1), [1996] Crim. L.R. 898; [1996] 2 Cr. App. R. 467, referred to. (7)R. v. Adams (No. 2), [1999] 1 W.L.R. 1500; [1998] 3 All E.R. 805, [1998] 1 Cr. App. R. 377, referred to. (8)R. v. Bry......
  • Karnam Singh a/l Gubakhus Singh and Others v Public Prosecutor
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
9 books & journal articles
  • Subject Index
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 12-4, November 2008
    • November 1, 2008
    ...253R vAccused [1991] 3NZLR 439 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 298R vAdam [2006] BCSC1430 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281R v Adams [1996] 2 Cr App R 467, CA. . 182–183,186, 195, 204R v Adams (No. 2) [1998] 1 Cr App R 377, CA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182,183, 206R......
  • Legal versus non-legal approaches to forensic science evidence
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 20-1, January 2016
    • January 1, 2016
    ...to impose Bayesian approaches to the interpretation of evidence on fact-finding in adversarial trials. See e.g. R v Doheny and Adams [1996] 2 Cr App R 467, [1997] 1 Cr App R 5. NRC (2009: 7–8, 87). In focusing primarily on techniques that involve comparison or pattern recognition, the infan......
  • Accusation as Proof: Uncorroborated Historic Sexual Abuse Allegations
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 84-2, April 2020
    • April 1, 2020
    ...was recognised by the face recognition camera, then all that isweighted with all the other facts.71. Cf. the discussion in R v Adams [1996] 2 Cr App R 467; R v FNC [2016] 1 WLR 980; U.S. v Hannigan (1994) 27 F.3d 890. SeeFitzgerald v The Queen (2014) 88 ALJR 779.72. Glanville Williams, The ......
  • Double Jeopardy Law Reform: A Criminal Justice Commentary
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 65-3, May 2002
    • May 1, 2002
    ...Scientific Techniques: DNA as a Test Case,’ [1992] Crim LR 687.93 R v Doheny and Adams [1997] 1 Cr App R 369, CA; R v Adams (Denis) [1996] 2 Cr App R 467, CA;R v Gordon [1995] 1 Cr App R 290, CA.94 Including several of the ‘Irish cases’ – the Guildford Four; the Birmingham Six – and many of......
  • Get Started for Free