R v Adams (Denis)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1996 |
| Date | 1996 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
DPP v Wilson
...necessary to give to the jury any special warning simply because the only evidence in the case was DNA evidence. 48 In R v. Adams [1996] 2Cr. App. R. 467, the Court of Appeal stated that there was nothing inherent in the nature of DNA evidence which supported the proposition that such evide......
-
Grazettes v The Queen
...of a formula, “but by the joint application of their individual common sense and knowledge of the world to the evidence before them”: R. v. Adams (Denis) [1996] 2 Cr. App. R. 467 at page 481E; and also Doheny and Adams at page 375B and R. v. Adams (Denis) (No. 2) [1998] 1 Cr. App. R. 377 at......
-
R v Webster
...App. No. 2/2010 (Ind. 27/2009), December 7th, 2010, dictum of Mottley, J.A. applied. (6)R. v. Adams (No. 1), [1996] Crim. L.R. 898; [1996] 2 Cr. App. R. 467, referred to. (7)R. v. Adams (No. 2), [1999] 1 W.L.R. 1500; [1998] 3 All E.R. 805, [1998] 1 Cr. App. R. 377, referred to. (8)R. v. Bry......
- Karnam Singh a/l Gubakhus Singh and Others v Public Prosecutor
Request a trial to view additional results
9 books & journal articles
-
Subject Index
...253R vAccused [1991] 3NZLR 439 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 298R vAdam [2006] BCSC1430 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281R v Adams [1996] 2 Cr App R 467, CA. . 182–183,186, 195, 204R v Adams (No. 2) [1998] 1 Cr App R 377, CA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182,183, 206R......
-
Legal versus non-legal approaches to forensic science evidence
...to impose Bayesian approaches to the interpretation of evidence on fact-finding in adversarial trials. See e.g. R v Doheny and Adams [1996] 2 Cr App R 467, [1997] 1 Cr App R 5. NRC (2009: 7–8, 87). In focusing primarily on techniques that involve comparison or pattern recognition, the infan......
-
Accusation as Proof: Uncorroborated Historic Sexual Abuse Allegations
...was recognised by the face recognition camera, then all that isweighted with all the other facts.71. Cf. the discussion in R v Adams [1996] 2 Cr App R 467; R v FNC [2016] 1 WLR 980; U.S. v Hannigan (1994) 27 F.3d 890. SeeFitzgerald v The Queen (2014) 88 ALJR 779.72. Glanville Williams, The ......
-
Double Jeopardy Law Reform: A Criminal Justice Commentary
...Scientific Techniques: DNA as a Test Case,’ [1992] Crim LR 687.93 R v Doheny and Adams [1997] 1 Cr App R 369, CA; R v Adams (Denis) [1996] 2 Cr App R 467, CA;R v Gordon [1995] 1 Cr App R 290, CA.94 Including several of the ‘Irish cases’ – the Guildford Four; the Birmingham Six – and many of......
Request a trial to view additional results