R v Anthony Sawoniuk
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 2000 |
| Date | 2000 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
24 cases
-
Myers v The Queen Cox v Same Brangman v Same
...a relationship is relevant to proof of offences charged, may also sometimes be analysed in these terms. Examples include R v Sawoniuk [2000] 2 Cr App R 220 at 234; R v Williams (Clarence) (1987) 84 Cr App R 299 and R v Underwood [1999] Crim LR 227. In either case Pettman is an example of t......
-
DPP v Timmons
...LR 773 DPP v MCNEILL UNREP CCA 31.7.2007 2007/20/4087 2007 IECCA 95 R v PETTMAN UNREP EWCA CRIM 2.5.1985 (EX TEMPORE) R v SAWONIUK 2000 2 CR APP R 220 2000 CRIM LR 506 R v M (T) & ORS 2000 1 WLR 421 2000 1 AER 148 MCGRATH EVIDENCE 2005 CHAP 9 DPP v K (B) 2000 2 IR 199 2000/7/2696 MAKIN v A......
-
Daryeon Blake Vaughn Blake v R
...of Lords in Porter v MagillWeeks v Magill [2002] 2 AC 357 50 See para. [5] above 51 [2013] JMCA Crim 14 52 [1993] 4 All ER 533 53 [2000] 2 Cr App R 220 ; [2000] All ER (D) 154 54 ( [1985] Lexis Citation 1520 unreported judgment delivered on 2 May 1985). 55 SCCA Nos 4 & 7/2004, judgment de......
-
R v S
...60 The principle of Pettman has been applied in a number of cases, for instance it has recently been re-affirmed by this Court in R v Sawoniuk [2000] 2 Cr App R 220, where, as the learned editors of Archbold remark: "… it was said that in order to make a rational assessment of evidence dire......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
`I do not Attach Great Significance to it': Taking Note of `The Holocaust' in English Case Law
...Appeal Tribunal, ex parte Shah [1998] 4 All ER 30.R v Ketter [1939] 1 All ER 729.R v Kirk [2006] EWCA Crim 725.R v Sawoniuk [2000] 2 Cr. App. R. 220.R v Sec. of State, ex parte B (24 June 1999) CO/1818/98.R v Sec. of State, ex parte Greenberg [1947] 2 All ER 550.Re Holy Trinity [2004] 2 All......
-
Bad Character: Criminal Justice Act 2003; Non-Defendant; Defendant Attacking Character of Another
...(see s. 100(1)(a) and (2); this appears to corre-spond to what the pre-Act law knows as ‘background evidence’: see R vSawoniuk [2000] 2 Cr App R 220); or if it is of ‘substantial probativevalue’ (s. 100(1)(b); for a list of factors to which a court must haveregard when deciding whether evid......
-
The Impact of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 on Similar Fact Evidence
...prejudice to any other way’ of estab-lishing propensity. This means, for example, adducing evidence of the3[1995] 2 Cr App R 251.4 [2000] 2 Cr App R 220.5 It should be noted that s. 103(1)(b) makes it clear that s. 101(1)(d) is not purely areplacement for similar fact evidence, as it also d......