R v Austin
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1913 |
| Year | 1913 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
8 cases
-
Ho Sheng Yu Garreth v PP
...PP v Tan Teck Hin [ 1992] 1 SLR (R) 672; [1992] 1 SLR 841 (refd) R v Emil Savundra (1968) 52 Cr App R 637 (refd) R v Frederick Austin [1913] 1 KB 551 (refd) R v Johnston [1977] 2 WWR 613 (refd) R v Jonathan Russell Green (1984) 6 Cr App R (S) 329 (refd) Tan Lai Kiat v PP [2010] 3 SLR 1042 (......
-
Ho Sheng Yu Garreth v Public Prosecutor
...the penalty for a first offender did not trouble the English Court of Criminal Appeal in a similar case. In The King v Frederick Austin [1913] 1 KB 551 (“Austin”), the offender was convicted of living on the earnings of prostitution and was deemed a rogue and vagabond within the meaning of ......
-
Rosina Mcmillan v Leonard David Pryce [NTR]
...history in the event he offends after 8 March 1997. It has no retrospective operation. I think the matter is governed by such cases as R v Austin [1913] 1 KB 551; Page v Winkler (1975) 12 SASR 126, Hoppo v Samuels (1978) 18 SASR 277 and Staska v GMH Pty Ltd (1970) 123 CLR 673 at 675 4Unlik......
-
R. v. Moulton,
...613; 3 A.R. 181, folld. [para. 9]. R. v. Inhabitants of St. Mary, Whitechapel (1843), 116 E.R. 811, appld. [para. 14]. R. v. Austin, [1913] 1 K.B. 551, appld. [para. Statutes Noticed: Criminal Code of Canada, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-34, sect. 236 [paras. 4, 5]; sect. 236.1 [para. 5]. Counsel: Rob......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Male Persons Soliciting or Importuning for Immoral Purposes
...is a matter for conjecture.Theconviction preceding the secondor subsequent conviction need not be on indictment (R. v. Austin(1913) 1K.B.551; 77J.P.271).Theindictment may be tried atquarter sessions and the accused may be charged with having com-mitted the offence on one specified day only,......