Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United Kingdom | +44 (0) 20 7284 8080

R v Austin

The Law Reports Cited in 12 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1913
Year1913
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 cases
  • Ho Sheng Yu Garreth v PP
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 30 Enero 2012
    ...PP v Tan Teck Hin [ 1992] 1 SLR (R) 672; [1992] 1 SLR 841 (refd) R v Emil Savundra (1968) 52 Cr App R 637 (refd) R v Frederick Austin [1913] 1 KB 551 (refd) R v Johnston [1977] 2 WWR 613 (refd) R v Jonathan Russell Green (1984) 6 Cr App R (S) 329 (refd) Tan Lai Kiat v PP [2010] 3 SLR 1042 (......
  • Ho Sheng Yu Garreth v Public Prosecutor
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 30 Enero 2012
    ...the penalty for a first offender did not trouble the English Court of Criminal Appeal in a similar case. In The King v Frederick Austin [1913] 1 KB 551 (“Austin”), the offender was convicted of living on the earnings of prostitution and was deemed a rogue and vagabond within the meaning of ......
  • Hall v Macpherson
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Justiciary
    • 19 Junio 1913
    ...6, 4 Adam, 303. 1 Gardner v. Lucas, (1878) 5 R. (H.L.) 105. 2 M'Pherson v. BoydSC, 1907 S.C. (J.) 42, 5 Adam, 247. 3 Rex v. AustinELR, [1913] 1 K. B. 551, 8 Crim. App. Cases, * The Summary Jurisdiction (Scotland) Act, 1908 (8 Edw. VII. cap. 65), sec. 75, sets forth the grounds upon which a ......
  • Rosina Mcmillan v Leonard David Pryce [NTR]
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court
    • 29 Agosto 1997
    ...history in the event he offends after 8 March 1997. It has no retrospective operation. I think the matter is governed by such cases as R v Austin [1913] 1 KB 551; Page v Winkler (1975) 12 SASR 126, Hoppo v Samuels (1978) 18 SASR 277 and Staska v GMH Pty Ltd (1970) 123 CLR 673 at 675 4Unlik......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Male Persons Soliciting or Importuning for Immoral Purposes
    • United Kingdom
    • Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles No. 22-1, January 1949
    • 1 Enero 1949
    ...is a matter for conjecture.Theconviction preceding the secondor subsequent conviction need not be on indictment (R. v. Austin(1913) 1K.B.551; 77J.P.271).Theindictment may be tried atquarter sessions and the accused may be charged with having com-mitted the offence on one specified day only,......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT