R v B
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2003 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 cases
-
R v E (T)
...remind ourselves that if the court concludes that the conviction is unsafe, it must be set aside. We approach this appeal in that way. 16 B was subsequently considered by a differently constituted division of this Court in Hooper [2003] EWCA Crim 2427. That was another case of sexual abus......
-
R v Mohammed Abdullah Yasain
...or alleged victim of the crime, even though the victim is not a party to the proceedings under the common law approach: see R v B [2003] 2 Cr App R 197 at paragraph 27; R v Killick [2012] 1 Cr App R 10, [2011] EWCA Crim 1608 at paragraph 48. There is the strongest public interest in finali......
-
R v R
...of the conviction, if there is one, may also arise for decision. Again, however, the issues which may arise are illustrated by R v B [2003] 2 Cr App R 197 and R v Smolinksi [2004] 2 Cr App R 661. No further citation of authority is needed." 68 Having stated that there had been prejudice to......
-
Terence John Hockey v The Queen
...elapsed and an application has now been made to re-open the decision of the Court of Appeal under the implicit jurisdiction identified in R v Yasain [2015] EWCA Crim 1277, [2016] QB 146. The application has been referred to the full court by the Registrar for determination on the papers. 5 ......
Request a trial to view additional results