R v Ball [Court of Criminal Appeal and in the House of Lords]

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1911
CourtHouse of Lords
Year1911
Date1911
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
38 cases
  • Manggai Singh v R
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • DPP v Nevin
    • Ireland
    • Court of Criminal Appeal
    • 14 March 2003
    ...DPP, PEOPLE V B(K) 2000 2 IR 199 AG V MARTIN JOYCE & WALSH 1929 IR 526 R V BOND 1906 2 KB 389 R V HAGAN 1873 12 COX CC 357 R V BALL 1911 AC 47 1 14th day of March 2003 by Mr. Justice Mr. Justice Geoghegan 2 This is an application by Mrs. Catherine Nevin the above-named applicant for lea......
  • R v Williams (Clarence)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 17 October 1986
    ...show that it is more probable that the accused committed the offence charged. The position is well stated in a dictum of Lord Atkinson in R. v. Ball (see 13-21, ante). At page 68 he said: 'Surely in an ordinary prosecution for murder you can prove previous acts or words of the accused to sh......
  • Teiko David Jamel Furbert and Another v The Queen
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 23 March 2000
    ...that it was the accused who killed the deceased. The law was stated as follows by Lord Atkinson in the course of counsel's submissions in Rex. v. Ball [1911] A.C. 47, 68:- "Surely in an ordinary prosecution for murder you can prove previous acts or words of the accused to shew he entertain......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT