R v Bateman
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1925 |
| Court | Court of Criminal Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
89 cases
-
R v Northavon District Council, ex parte Smith (pet. all.)
...caused by the manner of the defendant's driving must be very high. In his Lordship's opinion, the law as stated in R v BatemanUNK ((1925) 19 CrAppR 8) and Andrews v DPPELR ((1937) AC 576) was satisfactory as providing a proper basis for describing the crime of involuntary manslaughter. Sinc......
-
David Sellu v The Crown
...set out in R v Lawrence [1982] AC 510). On the contrary, it was held that it was sufficient to adopt the gross negligence tests following R v Bateman 19 Cr App R 8 and Andrews v DPP [1937] AC 576. 147 Going back to those decisions, in Bateman, Lord Hewart CJ put the test in this way (at pag......
-
R v Misra (Amit)
...is a sufficient direction to the jury to adopt the gross negligence tests set out by the Court of Appeal in the present case, following Rex v Bateman 19 Cr App R 8, and Andrews v Director of Public Prosecutions [1937] AC 576, and that it is not necessary to refer to the definition of reckle......
-
R v Adomako
...two authorities before the leading case, Andrews v DPPELR ((1937) AC 576): R v Doherty ((1887) 16 Cox CC 306, 309) and R v BatemanUNK ((1925) 19 Cr App R 8, 11). In Andrews, a case of motor manslaughter, Lord Atkin had quoted the passage from Bateman and (at p583) introduced the word "reckl......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 books & journal articles
-
A Different Ball Game—Why the Nature of Consent in Contact Sports Undermines a Unitary Approach
...lapse of skill, unless the participant’s conduct is such as to evince a recklessdisregard of the spectator’s safety”’.126 Rv Bateman (1925) 19 Cr App R 8.127 Caldwell v Maguire and Fitzgerald [2001] EWCA Civ 1054, [2002] PIQR P6.128 Ibid. per Lord Tuckey.129 Rv Barnes [2004] EWCA Crim 3246,......
-
Master or Servant: A Corporation's Liability for the Activities of a Ship's Master
...would have been successfulas no guiding ‘mind’ would have been necessary and the company’s83 Mandaraka-Sheppard, above n. 39 at 351.84 (1925) 19 Cr App R 8.85 Ibid. at 11.86 Simester and Sullivan, above n. 70 at 267.87 R v Cunningham [1957] 2 QB 396.A Corporation’s Liability for the Activit......
-
Rethinking the Mental Element in Involuntary Manslaughter
...Jurisprudence or the Philosophy of Positive Law (5th edn, rev J. Murray, London 1885) at 443–45.113. The authorities from R v Bateman (1927) 19 Cr App R 8 at 10–11 through to R v Rose [2018] QB 328 are consistent as far asthe conduct element is concerned.114. DPP v Morgan (n 104); RvG(n 3).......
-
A Betrayal of Trust? Back to the Drawing Board for Medical Manslaughter
...LR24; C Crosby, ‘Gross Negligence Manslaughter by Omission: The Emergence of a Good Samaritan Law?’ (2018) 82 JCL 127.12. R v Bateman (1927) 19 Cr App R 8; Adomako (n 10); R v Misra; R v Srivastava [2004] EWCA Crim 2375; R v Garg(Sundhanshu) [2012] EWCA Crim 2520; R v Kovvali [2013] EWCA Cr......
Request a trial to view additional results