R v Bexley London Borough, ex parte Jones

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1995
Year1995
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 cases
  • R v North West Lancashire Health Authority, ex parte A ; D ; G
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 29 Julio 1999
    ...to decide whether the latter was unlawful. The policy there and that in this case are not so obviously unlawful as that in R v. London Borough of Bexley, ex p. Jones [1995] ELR 42, where it effectively admitted no exceptions by reference to individual circumstances. Nevertheless, it has th......
  • Karen Mccluskey, Stephen Kerr, Patricia Hardie, Ann Marie Pratt And Caroline Kane Against North Lanarkshire Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Sheriff Court
    • 27 Noviembre 2015
    ...307 Mixnam’s Properties Ltd v Chertsey Urban DC [1965] AC 735 R v Warwickshire County Council [1995] ELR 217 R v London Borough of Bexley [1995] ELR 42 R v The Secretary of State for the Environment [2011] EWHC 1975 (Admin) Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982 7 Offences, etc.S (1) Any pers......
  • R (Guittard) v The Secretary of State for Justice
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 18 Noviembre 2009
    ...a view to considering whether an exception should be made in an individual case. He relied on R v London Borough of Bexley ex parte Jones [1995] ELR 42 for this proposition. That was a case concerning educational grants. D's submission was that the circumstances there were very different no......
  • In the matter of an application by Stiofain O'Dalaigh for Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Northern Ireland)
    • 19 Diciembre 2007
    ...unlawful. The policy there and that in this case are not so obviously unlawful as that in R v. London Borough of Bexley, ex parte Jones [1995] ELR 42, where it effectively admitted no exceptions by reference to individual circumstances. Nevertheless, it has the same basic flaw both in form ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT