R v Birmingham City Council, ex parte O
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Neutral Citation | [2002] EWHC 2118 (Admin) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Date | 2002 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
R Redcar and Cleveland Independent Providers Association and Others v Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council
...outlined by Mr Justice Stanley Burnton as then was in R ( Birmingham Care consortium and others ) v Birmingham City Council [2002] EWHC 2118 (Admin) when issues concerning allocation of resources are involved: 32 "Out of deference to the arguments put before me, however, I mention some gene......
-
R and Others v Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council
... ... is no excuse for non-fulfilment of that obligation ( R v London Borough of Islington ex parte McMillan (1995) 30 BMLR 20 at page 30; and R v Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council ex parte Help ... But in the other cases (e.g. R (Birmingham Care Consortium) v Birmingham City Council [2002] EWHC 2188 (Admin) ; R (Forest Care Homes) v ... ...
-
R (Haggerty and Others) v St Helens Borough Council
... ... Servite Houses ex parte Goldsmith (12 May 2000 – CO/3652/99 ) in which a private sector provider decided to close a ... Similarly, in Birmingham Care Consortium v. Birmingham City Council [2002] EWHC 2112 (7377) , Stanley Burnton J said ... ...
-
Ian Wood and Another v Leeds City Council
...their money. It must fairly balance those duties one against the other." ( R (Birmingham Care Consortium) v Birmingham City Council [2002] EWHC 2118 (Admin); [2003] BLGR 119 at [32], citing from R v Newcastle-upon-Tyne City Councilex p Dixon (unrep), per Auld J.). 72 He submitted that the d......
Request a trial to view additional results