R v Bow Street Magistrates, ex parte Mackeson
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 25 June 1981 |
| Date | 25 June 1981 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
17 cases
-
Somchai Liangsiriprasert v United States of America
... ... 55 , 93, H.L.(E.) not applied ... Reg. v. Bow Street Magistrates, Ex parte Mackeson ( 1981 ) 75 Cr.App.R. 24 , D.C ... ...
-
State (Trimbole) v The Governor of Mountjoy Prison
...of the Constitution and a direct duty arises to prevent such abuse of their process. R. v. Bow Street Magistrates, ex p. Mackeson (1981) 75 Cr. App. R. 24 considered. Cases mentioned in this In re Nielsen [1984] A.C. 606; [1984] 2 W.L.R. 737; [1984] 2 All E.R. 81. The State (Furlong) v. Kel......
-
Asliturk v City of Westminster Magistrates' Court and another
...chronological order are: R v Weil (1881-2) 9 Q.B.D 701; Anthanssiadis v Government of Greece and others [1971] A.C. 282; R v Bow Street Magistrates’ ex parte Mackeson (1982) 75 Cr. App. R. 24; and R v Bow Street Magistrates ex parte Van der Holst (1986) 83 Cr. App. R. 114. The contrary not ......
-
CF v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
...contention that it is in substance what has happened to them in this case. 102 In R v Bow Street Magistrates, ex parte Mackeson (1982) 75 Cr. App. R. 24, the applicant, who sought an order of prohibition, had been wanted on fraud charges in England. His extradition from Rhodesia was not sou......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
...been oppression and abuse of process, the appellantrelied on the decision of the Divisional Court in R v Bow StreetMC, ex pMackeson (1981) 75 CrAppR 24. There, a Britishsubject was deported from Zimbabwe to face charges of fraud inEngland; but the court held that the deportation had been ad......