R v William Brady

JurisdictionNorthern Ireland
JudgeGirvan LJ
Judgment Date25 May 2011
Neutral Citation[2011] NICA 4
Date25 May 2011
CourtCourt of Appeal (Northern Ireland)
Year2011
Neutral Citation No. [2011] NICA 4
Ref:
GIR8098
Judgment: approved by the Court for handing down
Delivered:
25/02/11
(subject to editorial corrections)*
IN HER MAJESTY’S COURT OF APPEAL IN NORTHERN IRELAND
________
CRIMINAL APPEAL (NORTHERN IRELAND) ACT 1980
________
REGINA
-v-
WILLIAM BRADY
_______
Before: Higgins LJ, Girvan LJ and Coghlin LJ
________
GIRVAN LJ
Introduction
[1] The appellant was granted leave to appeal against sentence by the
single judge on 5 January 2011. He appeals against the fine element of the
sentence imposed on him in respect of four offences under the Social
Security Administration (Northern Ireland) Act 1992. He was convicted of
two offences of failure to declare a change of circumstances and two
offences of making a false declaration with a view to obtaining income
support and housing benefit. These are particularised in para [2] below.
He was sentenced to four months imprisonment suspended for two years
on each count and fined £12,000 on count 1 with twelve months
imprisonment in default. The appellant contends that the combination of
both a suspended sentence and the fine resulted in a sentence which was
excessive and wrong in principle.
The factual background

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • R v Stephen Coleman
    • United Kingdom
    • Crown Court (Northern Ireland)
    • 17 Febrero 2020
    ...criminality on a commercial basis, and profits or losses on these scales would reflect significant criminal conduct. [32] In R –v- Brady [2011] NICA 4 (a social security benefit fraud case) guidance of such a specific nature was not given, although reference was made at [14] to a number of ......
  • R v Coleman
    • United Kingdom
    • Crown Court (Northern Ireland)
    • 17 Febrero 2020
    ...criminality on a commercial basis, and profits or losses on these scales would reflect significant criminal conduct. [32] In R –v- Brady [2011] NICA 4 (a social security benefit fraud case) guidance of such a specific nature was not given, although reference was made at [14] to a number of ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT