Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United Kingdom | +44 (0) 20 7284 8080

R v Burah

The Law Reports Cited in 59 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1877
Date1877
Year1877
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
39 cases
  • Osborne v Commonwealth
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Ebanks (AG) v R
    • Cayman Islands
    • Court of Appeal (Cayman Islands)
    • 3 d1 Dezembro d1 2007
    ...Ref.), [1985] LRC (Const) 642, referred to. (16) Phillips v. EyreELR(1870), L.R. 6 Q.B. 1, followed. (17) R. v. BurahELR(1878), 3 App. Cas. 889, followed. (18) R. v. Lichniak, [2003] 1 A.C. 903; [2002] 4 All E.R. 1122; (2002), 1 Cr. App. R. 33; [2003] H.R.L.R. 8; [2002] UKHL 47, referred to......
  • Premier, Eastern Cape, and Others v Cekeshe and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...distinguished F Pretoria North Town Council v A1 Electric Ice-Cream Factory (Pty) Ltd 1953 (3) SA 1 (A): referred to The Queen v Burah (1878) 3 App Cas 889 (PC): referred to R v Abdurahman 1950 (3) SA 136 (A): distinguished R v Carelse 1943 CPD 242: distinguished R v Commission for Racial E......
  • R Misick v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 12 d3 Agosto d3 2009
    ...treated as apt to confer plenary law-making authority. For this proposition there is ample authority in the Privy Council ( R v Burah (1878) 3 App Cas 889; Riel v The Queen (1885) 10 App Cas 675; Ibralebbe v The Queen [1964] AC 900) and the High Court of Australia Union Steamship Company of......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
8 books & journal articles
  • Politics, law and the Constitution in McCawley's case.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 30 No. 3, December 2006
    • 1 d5 Dezembro d5 2006
    ...the Constitution (8th ed, 1915) 101. (250) McCawley v The King (1918) 26 CLR 9, 44. (251) Ibid. (252) Ibid. (253) Ibid 57. (254) (1873) 3 App Cas 889. (255) McCawley v The King (1918) 26 CLR 9, 64-5, citing R v Burah (1873) 3 App Cas 889, 905 (Lord (256) (1873) 3 App Cas 889, 904 (Lord Selb......
  • Slaying the Ghost of Henry VIII: A Reconsideration of the Limits upon the Delegation of Commonwealth Legislative Power
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 38-2, June 2010
    • 1 d2 Junho d2 2010
    ...21 (1931) 46 CLR 73 ('Dignan'). 22 Ibid 101. 23 (1909) 8 CLR 626 (‘Baxter’). 24 See particularly R v Burah (1878) 3 App Cas 889. 25 (1909) 8 CLR 626 ('Baxter'), 634. 26 Ibid. 27 See on this point the observations of George Winterton, Parliament, the Executive and the Governor-General (1983)......
  • Heresy as Orthodoxy: Were the Founders Progressivists?
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 31-1, March 2003
    • 1 d6 Março d6 2003
    ...v Commonwealth (1904) 1 CLR 329, 338–9 (Griffith CJ).56 Ibid; and see Kirk, above n 1, 344; cf Donaghue, above n 2, 153.57 R v Burah (1878) 3 App Cas 889. 2003 Were the Founders Progressivists? 97____________________ ____________________ ______________________ ___________________ ___protect......
  • ENGLISH STATUTES IN SINGAPORE COURTS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1991, December 1991
    • 1 d0 Dezembro d0 1991
    ...shall continued to hold their offices and to act under the Regulations to be made under this Ordinance.” 70 3 & 4 Wm. IV c.85. 71 (1878) 3 App. Cas. 889. 72 Ibid., at p.904. 73 See Braddell, R., “Heirs and the Common Law of the Colony”[1941] M.L.J. xlviii in which he wrote: “Whether there i......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT