R v Butterwasser
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Year | 1948 |
| Date | 1948 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
18 cases
-
Thompson v The Queen
... ... 954C–D , 955D ) ... Mitchell v. The Queen [ 1998 ] 2 W.L.R. 839 , P.C. and dictum of Lord Goddard C.J. in Rex v. Butterwasser [ 1948 ] 1 K.B. 4 , 6, C.C.A. applied ... (4) That section 4 of the United Nations Declaration on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders Act 1984 did not require examination before trial of the defendant's allegations of physical ill-treatment by the police; and that ... ...
-
R v de Vere
...when the defendant is being cross-examined and he himself is giving evidence. If he does not give evidence, it does not apply and R. v. Butterwasser is binding authority to that effect. 14 The result of that is that the learned Judge was wrong in coming to the conclusion that the calling of......
-
Gilbert v The Queen
...must be raised by calling evidence or putting questions on that issue to witnesses for the prosecution: see per Lord Goddard CJ in Rex v Butterwasser [1948] 1 KB 4, 6. Their Lordships are of opinion that where the issue of good character is not raised by the defence in evidence, the judge ......
-
R v Becouarn
...of the prosecution case were able to follow that course. Criticism of the state of the law, not least of the effect of the ruling in R v Butterwasser, and the degree of advantage which it conferred on defendants in criminal trials, mounted – in the Eleventh Report of the Criminal Law Revisi......
Get Started for Free
