R v Bywaters ; R v Thompson
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1922 |
| Date | 1922 |
| Court | Court of Criminal Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Harris v DPP
... ... The King [1949] A.C. 182 at p. 191, in commenting on what Lord Sumner had said in Thompson v. Director of Public Prosecutions [1918] A.C. 221 at p. 232, "An accused person need set up no defence other than a general ... 17 (page 566) ... 18 I do not find anything in the report of the cases of Bywaters and Thompson , 17 Criminal Appeal Reports, pages 66 and 71, which could be read as extending the principle of Makin's case ... 19 ... ...
-
Harris v DPP
... ... The King [1949] A.C. 182 at p. 191, in commenting on what Lord Sumner had said in Thompson v. Director of Public Prosecutions [1918] A.C. 221 at p. 232, "An accused person need set up no defence other than a general ... 17 (page 566) ... 18 I do not find anything in the report of the cases of Bywaters and Thompson , 17 Criminal Appeal Reports, pages 66 and 71, which could be read as extending the principle of Makin's case ... 19 ... ...
- DPP v Pringle (No 2)
-
People (Attorney-General) v Murtagh
...must be imposed. I would dismiss the appeal. (1) Before Haugh, McLoughlin and Kenny JJ. (1) [1929] I. R. 526. (2) [1955] I. R. 324. (2) 17 Cr. App. R. 66. (1) [1951] 2 Q. B. (1) [1947] K. B. 194. (1) [1963] N. I. 11. (1) Before ÓDálaigh ó dálaigh, Haugh and Walsh JJ. ...
Request a trial to view additional results