R v Chelmsford Crown Court, ex parte Chief Constable of Essex Police

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date27 July 1993
Date27 July 1993
CourtDivisional Court

Queen's Bench Divisional Court

Regina
and
Chelmsford Crown Court, Ex parte Chief Constable of Essex Police

Judicial review - High Court power - statutory limitations

Act limits judicial review power

The power of the High Court to review decisions of the crown court was limited to the provisions of sections 28 and 29 of the Supreme Court Act 1981. The general power of judicial review in section 31 was subject to those sections.

The Queen's Bench Divisional Court (Lord Justice Glidewell and Mr Justice Cresswell) so held on June 25 in determining that it did not have jurisdiction to hear an application for judicial review of an order of Judge Beaumont, QC, at Chelmsford Crown Court that statements taken from the police during an informal resolution of complaints and which were inadmissible at trial under section 104(3) of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 should nevertheless be disclosed to the defence.

LORD JUSTICE GLIDEWELL said the crown court was in the same position as the High Court and its decisions were not open to challenge in the High Court.

However, when the crown court was established it was recognised that some of its decisions should be subject to the supervisory power of the Divisional Court.

Sections 28 and 29 of the 1981 Act expressly granted...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • R (TH) v Wood Green Crown Court
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • October 31, 2006
    ...points out, and it is not in dispute, that this includes where the claim for judicial review seeks a declaration ( R v Chelmsford Crown Court ex parte Chief Constable of Essex 1994 1WLR 359). 7 The Secretary of State says that, as a matter of ordinary language, the order in question plainly......
  • R v Chester Crown Court ex parte Cheshire County Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • October 6, 1995
    ...proceedings, the Court drew the attention of counsel to the fact that none of their skeletons refer to the case of R v Chelmsford Crown Court ex parte Chief Constable of Essex (1994) 1 W.L.R. 359. Mr Hockman QC, who has made submissions on behalf of the Applicants, came fully prepared to ar......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT