R v Chelsea College of Art and Design, ex parte Nash
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2000 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Mr David Anthony Winstanley v Professor Brian D Sleeman (First Defendant) University of Leeds (Second Defendnat)
...to Sedley LJ's list of areas which are off limits to the court rather than detracting from them. 54 Finally, for completeness, I mention R v Chelsea ex parte Nash [2000] ELR 686, (tab 6). I do so because it was referred to by Mr Oldham but I have to say I do not see how it takes matters any......
- R v Commissioner for Local Administration, ex parte H (A Minor)
-
Nash v Chelsea College of Art and Design
...to the Committee; and that the Committee should have informed her of the material that was to go before it. His decision is reported at [2000] Ed C R 571, and I refer to it for the previous history of this matter, and the constitution of the 3 As a result of the decision of Elias J, the Aca......
-
R (Turpin) v Commissioner for Local Administration
...in his skeleton argument, has referred to observations made by Elias J recently in R v Chelsea College of Art and Design, ex parte Nash [2000] Ed CR 571 at 583D: “It is a strong principle of English law that a decision making body should not consider the relevant material without giving the......