R v Chelsea College of Art and Design, ex parte Nash

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year2000
Date2000
CourtQueen's Bench Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Mr David Anthony Winstanley v Professor Brian D Sleeman (First Defendant) University of Leeds (Second Defendnat)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 13 December 2013
    ...to Sedley LJ's list of areas which are off limits to the court rather than detracting from them. 54 Finally, for completeness, I mention R v Chelsea ex parte Nash [2000] ELR 686, (tab 6). I do so because it was referred to by Mr Oldham but I have to say I do not see how it takes matters any......
  • R v Commissioner for Local Administration, ex parte H (A Minor)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 21 December 1999
  • R (Turpin) v Commissioner for Local Administration
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 28 June 2001
    ...in his skeleton argument, has referred to observations made by Elias J recently in R v Chelsea College of Art and Design, ex parte Nash [2000] Ed CR 571 at 583D: “It is a strong principle of English law that a decision making body should not consider the relevant material without giving the......
  • Nash v Chelsea College of Art and Design
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 20 July 2001
    ... ... Third, the clerk to the Appeal Committee, for the avoidance of doubt, was neither a participant in the review decision nor its interpreter." ... The letter also took issue with Ms Nash's solicitors' reliance on ex parte Ermakov , another matter that I shall have to address below ... 19 On 1 February 2001, Clive Nicholls, the Dean of the School of Design at the College, and who had been the chairman of the Academic Committee that had reconsidered Ms Nash's appeal, signed a witness ... ...