R v Chief Constable of the Warwickshire Constabulary, ex parte Fitzpatrick

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtDivisional Court
Year1998
Date1998

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
39 cases
  • Power-Hynes and Another v Norwich Magistrates' Court and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 26 June 2009
    ...at material relating to Hunt and HCAF. In support of this submission, he cited the decision of this Court in R (Fitzpatrick) v Chief Constable of Warwickshire [1999] 1 WLR 564. In that case, the warrant sought documentation and information “relating to the stated offence”. The offence, adva......
  • BES Commercial Electricity Ltd v Cheshire West and Chester Borough Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 2 April 2019
    ...any such alleged failures. 18 Again, there is no shortage of authority on this point. Of particular note is the case of R (Fitzpatrick) v CC Warwickshire [1999] 1 WLR 564 in which the Divisional Court held at p. 579: “Judicial review is not a fact finding exercise and it is an extremely uns......
  • R (Sher) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 21 July 2010
    ...decision to issue a search warrant may potentially be the subject of judicial review: see, for example, R v Chief Constable of the Warickshire Constabulary ex parte Fitzpatrick [1999] 1 WLR 564. However, as Jowitt J made plain in that case, such a decision can only be challenged in a public......
  • Foulser v HM Revenue and Customs
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
    • 25 January 2013
    ...R v Belmarsh Magistrates' Court, ex parte WattsUNK [1999] 2 Cr App R 188 R v Chief Constable of Warwickshire, ex parte FitzpatrickWLR [1999] 1 WLR 564 R v Horseferry Road Magistrates' Court, ex parte BennettELR [1994] 1 AC 42 R (on the application of Chief Constable of Nottinghamshire) v No......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Recent Judicial Decisions
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles No. 73-3, January 2000
    • 1 January 2000
    ...a search had been authorised in the warrant.His Lordship noted that in RvChief Constableofthe WarwickshireConstabulary, ex p Fitzpatrick [1999] 1 WLR 564 it had been said thatthe criteria which a magistrate had to be satisfied of in s. 8(1) had to besatisfied in respect of material that was......