R v Chung Chuck R v Wong Kit R v Sales Services Ltd R v Associated Growers Ltd
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1929 |
| Date | 1929 |
| Year | 1929 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
Gonzalez v R
...500; [1935] All E.R. Rep. 139; (1935), 153 L.T. 283; 51 T.L.R. 508; 104 L.J.P.C. 58; 79 Sol. Jo. 541, considered. (5) Chung Chuck v. R., [1930] A.C. 244; (1929), 142 L.T. 266; 46 T.L.R. 134; 99 L.J.P.C. 71, followed. (6) Commr. of Police v. Harris, Court of Appeal, Criminal App. No. 2 of 19......
-
Counsel for the Respondent v R
...and Regina Respondent APPEARANCES: Ms. Sonia Timothy Counsel for the Appellant Ms. Olivia Nixon, Counsel for the Respondent Chuck v R [1930] A.C. 244 and Holder v R [1980] A.C. 115 within which it was decided that the language of the Order in Council did not authorise the Court of Appeal to......
-
R. v. MacNeil, (1978) 38 N.S.R.(2d) 294 (CoCt)
...D.L.R. 1; 7 Can. Abr. 16; R. v. Bell, [1925] S.C.R. 59; 43 C.C.C. 286; [1925] 2 D.L.R. 57; 13 Can. Abr. 1597; Chung Chuck v. The King, [1930] A.C. 244; [1930] 1 W.W.R. 129; 53 C.C.C. 14; [1930] 2 D.L.R. 97; 7 Can. Abr. 189; Nadan v. The King, [1926] A.C. 482; [1926] 1 W.W.R. 801; 45 C.C.C. ......
-
McLAUGHLIN and MONTAQUE v R
...McLAUGHLIN and MONTAQUE and R. R. Wheeler for the appellants; C.J. Malcolm for the Crown/respondent. Cases cited: (1)Chung Chuck v. R., [1930] A.C. 244; (1929), 142 L.T. 266; 46 T.L.R. 134; 99 L.J.P.C. 71, referred to. (2)Gonzalez v. R., 1984–85 CILR 256, followed. (3)Holder v. R., [1980] A......
Request a trial to view additional results