R v Civil Service Appeal Board, ex parte Bruce

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1988
Year1988
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
45 cases
  • R v Lord Chancellor's Department, ex parte Nangle
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
  • Shashikanth v NHS
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 11 October 2022
    ...decision makers have been judicially reviewed, such as McClaren v Home Office [1990] ICR 824, R v Civil Service Appeal Board ex p Bruce [1988] ICR 649 and R v Civil Service Appeal Board ex p Cunningham [1992] ICR 77 In his oral submissions, Mr Lock contended that Mr Auburn's position elides......
  • R v Civil Service Appeal Board, ex parte Cunningham
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 4 March 1991
    ...accepted on this appeal. Previously it had been so decided by the Divisional Court in R. v. Civil Service Appeal Board, Ex parte Bruce [1988] I.C.R. 649. There it was held that the Board was a public law body, but in the exercise of its discretion the court declined to give Mr Bruce any rel......
  • Roy v Kensington and Chelsea and Westminster Family Practitioner Committee
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 6 February 1992
    ...distinction between the facts of this case and those of Mr. Bruce — referring to Reg. v. Civil Service Appeal Board, Ex parte Bruce [1988] I.C.R. 649. — I disagree. In this case, unlike Ex parte Bruce, which falls within the second category, the plaintiff is not making any complaint about d......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Expanding the Purview of Accountability in Employment by the State
    • Jamaica
    • Transitions in Caribbean Law Lawmaking in the Caribbean
    • 21 November 2013
    ...courts have never fully developed the public/private law doctrine as exhibited in the UK courts, perhaps because Order 53 36. [1988] 3 All ER 686 (DC). 37. McClaren (n 15) 836–37. 38. [1995] NI 49 (QB) 7 (of LexisNexis printout) ( Re Aitken’s ). Transitions in Caribbean Law mechanisms were ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT