R v Clark
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1955 |
| Date | 1955 |
| Court | Court of Criminal Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 cases
-
R v St. Louis
...he or his counsel avoids making specific allegations of misconduct. This practice has a long history and support for it can be found in Clark (1955) 39 Cr. App. R. 120; (1955) 2 QB 469 and Jones (1923) 17 Cr. App. R. 117. With such judges a suggestion that a witness is mistaken or has misu......
- The State v Gobin and Griffith
-
R v Selvey
...than an emphatic denial of the charge (see also R. v. Jones (1923) 17 Cr.App.R. 117 per Lord Hewart, L.C.J.; R. v. Clark [1955] 2 Q.B. 469 per Lord Goddard, L.C.J.). 29If it does and in fact involves an imputation on the character of the prosecutor or a witness for the prosecution, does th......
-
R v Britzman
...he or his counsel avoids making specific allegations of misconduct. This practice has a long history and support for it can be found in R. v. Clark (1955) 39 Cr. App. R. 120 and R. v. Jones (1923) 17 Cr. App. R. 117. With such Judges a suggestion that a witness is mistaken or has misunderst......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Recent Judicial Decisions
...of the challenger must always beavailable so that the jury can balance the issue. R. v.Jenkins (1945) 114 L.J.K.B. 425; R. v. Clark [1955] 3 All E.R.29;R.v. Cook [1959] 3 All E.R. 97. The Court of Appeal feltthat the case before them was just such a case where this principlewas of paramount......