R v Cockshott
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1898 |
| Year | 1898 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 cases
-
R Ali Bahbahani v Ealing Magistrates' Court
...of section 17A and section 20 deprives a magistrates' court of jurisdiction leading to the proceedings being a nullity. In the case of R v Cockshott [1898] 1 QB 582 a Divisional Court held that the failure to inform an accused of his right to be tried by a jury, when he was entitled to mak......
-
Re McC. (A Minor)
...authority and which resulted in a trespass to the person. 48 Lord Lowry C.J. in giving the judgment of the Court of Appeal referred to Reg. v. Cockshott [1898] 1 Q.B. 582 and Reg. v. Kettering Justices, Ex parte Patmore [1968] 1 W.L.R. 1436. These are both cases where convictions following ......
-
R v Ashton; R v Draz; R v O'Reilly
...procedure laid down for determining mode of trial will have the consequence that any subsequent hearing will be regarded as ultra vires: R v Cockshott [1898] 1 QB 582, R v Kent Justices, ex parte Machin (1952) 36 Cr App R 23, R v Horseferry Road Magistrates' Court ex parte Constable [1981] ......
-
R (Rahmdezfouli) v Crown Court at Wood Green
... ... He should at least have been given the opportunity to do so ... 12 There is a clear line of previous authority in support of Mr Clegg's position. In R v Cockshott and Others (1898) 1 QB a statutory predecessor to section 17A was considered and the defendant, who was legally represented, pleaded guilty on advice, the clerk of the court not having informed him fully of the position he faced. Wright J said (at 586): "I think it would be wrong to ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results