R v Cole
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1941 |
| Court | Court of Criminal Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Alexander v The State
...or to rebut a defence which would otherwise be open to the accused.” 18 That dictum was unanimously approved by the House of Lords R v. Ball [1911] A.C. 47 and in Thompson v. R [1918] A.C. 221; and as Viscount Simon verily stated in Harris v. DPP [1952] 1 All E.R. 1044, 1046G, it has been c......
-
Yaseen All E.R v The State
...that the appeals should be allowed and a re-trial had. However, I am obliged to comment on the ruling of Bollers, J., as he then was, in R v. Gomes (1962) 5 W.I.R. 7. I do so because those who, at times, question the correctness of certain statements made in that judgment seem to have lost ......
-
People (Attorney General) v Coleman
...be retried. (1) Before Sullivan C.J., Maguire P. and Overend J. (1) [1931] I. R. 713. (2) [1894] A. C. 57. (3) [1906] 2 K. B. 389. (4) 28 Cr. App. R. 43. (5) 2 Cr. App. R. 80. (6) [1944] A. C. 315. (1) [1904] 1 K. B. 184. (2) [1927] 1 K. B. 323. (3) [1909] 1 K. B. 568. (4) [1920] 1 K. B. 21......
- R v Zielinski
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Law Reports, Transcripts, and the Fabric of the Criminal Law—A Speculation
...exclusion ofany similar fact evidence which was not in fact relevant to the defence eventuallyraised by the accused: e.g., R v Cole (1941) 28 Cr App R 43. 32 See K. S. Thomson, Living Fossil: The Story of the Coelacanth (Norton: New 1991) 22–4. 33 [1957] 2 QB 396. Although I used this examp......