R v Comiskey

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date29 November 1990
Date29 November 1990
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • R v Banks (David Malcolm)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • Invalid date
  • R v Raymond George May
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 14 May 2008
    ...problems for the trial judge, often exacerbated by lack of information, as illustrated by cases such as R v Dickens [1990] 2 QB 102, R v Comiskey (1990) 12 Cr App R (S) 562, R v Chrastny (No 2) [1991] 1 WLR 1385, R v Ahmed [2005] 1 WLR 122, and the recent case of R v Glatt [2006] EWCA C......
  • R v Harjinder Singh
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 25 May 2005
    ...find that the realisable assets were of the same value as the amount of the benefit from drug trafficking. Mr Howarth cited Comiskey 12 Cr.App.R (S) 562. It is sufficient to read the headnote: "The court was satisfied that the sentencer was justified in assessing the value of the appellant'......
  • R v Ward (Barry)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • Invalid date
    ... ... of the court:R v Younis [2008] EWCA Crim 2950; [2009] 2 Cr App R (S) 247, CANo additional cases were cited in argument.The following additional cases, although not cited, were referred to in the skeleton arguments:R v Barnham [2005] EWCA Crim 1049; [2006] 1 Cr App R (S) 83, CAR v Comiskey (1990) 93 Cr App R 227, CAR (Lichniak) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] EWHC Admin 294; [2002] QB 296; [2001] 3 WLR 933; [2001] 4 All ER 934, DC and CA APPLICATION for leave to appealOn 30 September 2005 in the Crown Court at Leeds the defendant, Barry Ward, was sentenced, on ... ...
  • Get Started for Free