R v Cook, ex parte DPP

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date2001
Year2001
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 cases
  • Bovell-Swanson v R
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 5 November 2010
    ...v. R., 2000 CILR 413, applied. (5) Piggott v. Sims, [1972] Crim. L.R. 595; [1973] R.T.R. 15, followed. (6) R. v. Cook, ex p. D.P.P., [2001] Crim. L.R. 321, referred to. (7) R. v. Francis, [1990] 1 W.L.R. 1264; [1991] 1 All E.R. 225; (1990), 91 Cr. App. R. 271; [1990] Crim. L.R. 431, applied......
  • Carl Defreitas v R & R Investments
    • St Vincent
    • High Court (Saint Vincent)
    • 11 January 2018
    ...earlier stage). In Jolly v. the Director of Public Prosecutions [2000] Crim LR 471 applied in Cook v. Director of Public Prosecutions [2001] Crim LR 321 it was said to be ‘beyond argument’ that there is a general discretion to permit the prosecution to call evidence after closing its case. ......
3 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Drink and Drug Drive Case Notes Preliminary Sections
    • 29 August 2015
    ...! (2003) 167 JP 418, DC! 509 ...................................................... Cook, R v, ex p DPP [2001] Crim LR 321, DC! 585 .......................... Coomaraswamy, R v [1976] RTR 21, [1976] Crim LR 260, CA! 160 Coombs v Kehoe [1972] 1 WLR 797, [1972] 2 All ER 55, [1972] RTR 224, ........
  • Other Issues
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Drink and Drug Drive Case Notes Contents
    • 29 August 2015
    ...any longer to speak in terms of ‘exceptional circumstances’…”. The answer to the question was “no”. Appeal dismissed. R v Cook ex p DPP [2001] Crim LR 321, 19 December 2000, QBD (DC) A prosecution application to re-open its case and recall a witness to deal with evidence previously omitted ......
  • ‘Take it from Me…’—The Roles of the Judge and Lay Assessors in Deciding Questions of Law in Appeals to the Crown Court
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 69-5, October 2005
    • 1 October 2005
    ...Crown Court Index 2005 (Sweet & Maxwell: London,2005) 51; Sprack, above n. 1 at 13.18.3R vOrpin (1974) 59 Cr App R 231; Cook vDPP [2001] Crim LR 321.442 The development of the ruleThe leading case, R vOrpin4, concerned a case where a judge had sat withtwo justices of the peace, i.e. lay ass......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT