R v Corby District Council, ex parte McLean
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1975 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
R (on the application of Patrick Mahoney and Frances Jones) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
...is to recognize a person's distress at being compelled to move out of his home when land is compulsorily acquired. In R. v Corby District Council, ex p. McLean [1975] 1 W.L.R. 735 Lord Widgery C.J. said (at p.736H) that "[no] doubt the purpose of [the provision in section 29(1)] is to make ......
-
Earthquake Commission v Insurance Council of New Zealand Incorporated
...[54] above. 113 Relying on R v Lord Leigh [1897] 1 QB 132 (CA) at 145 per A L Smith LJ, R v Corby District Court ex parte McLean [1975] 1 WLR 735 (QB) and Commissioner of State Revenue (Victoria) v Royal Insurance of Australia Ltd [1994] HCA 61, (1994) 182 CLR 114 Earthquake Commission v ......
-
Greater London Council v Holmes
...'the carrying out of redevelopment' are to be given their ordinary meaning, as it was said that they should by Lord Widgery in R. v. Corby District Council, then I would consider those words to mean, or at least to include, the putting up of new buildings. Here the Greater London Council ar......
1 books & journal articles
-
The Meaning of Home: A Chimerical Concept or a Legal Challenge?
...1992, s. 222.4 Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988, Schedule A.5 See Family Law Act 1996.6Rv. Corby District Council, ex p McLean [1975] 1 W.L.R. 735, at 736, per LordWidgery CJ.7 This ability to tie up land for generations was overridden by Parliament in theSettled Land Acts 1882–90, rev......