R v Cornwall County Council, ex parte Hardy

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date2001
Year2001
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
26 cases
  • The Queen (on the application of Isabel Haden) v Shropshire Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 14 Enero 2020
    ...“likely” to have on the environment. 14 The Claimants rely upon the decision of Harrison J in R (ex p. Hardy) v Cornwall County Council [2001] Env LR 25. There is little between the parties on the main principle to be derived from Hardy. It is encapsulated at [56] where Harrison J said: “it......
  • McCallig v an Bord Pleanála and Others
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 24 Enero 2013
    ...PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT (STRATEGIC INFRASTRUCTURE) ACT 2006 S21 EEC DIR 2009/147 ANNEX I R v CORNWALL CO COUNCIL, EX PARTE HARDY 2001 ENV LR 25 2001 JPL 786 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT ACT 2000 S143(1)(A) GLENCRE TEO v BORD PLEANALA UNREP MACMENAMIN 2.5.2006 (EX TEMPORE) PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT RE......
  • Friends of the Earth Ltd and Another v North Yorkshire County Council Third Energy Uk Gas Ltd (Interested Party)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 20 Diciembre 2016
    ...local planning authority's assessment can only be challenged on public law grounds. See R v Rochdale MBC ex p. Milne [2001] Env. LR 416; R v Cornwall CC, ex p. Hardy [2001] Env. LR 25; R (Blewett) v Derbyshire CC [2004] Env. LR 22 In R v Cornwall CC, ex p. Hardy, Harrison J. said at [56] to......
  • Petition By Helen Douglas Against Perth And Kinross Council And Rds Element Power Limited (interested Party)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 4 Mayo 2017
    ...effective opportunities to participate in the decision-making procedures.Reference was made to R v Cornwall County Council, ex p Hardy, [2001] Env LR 25; and Smith v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, [2003] 2 P & CR 11. The Lord Ordinary erred in upholding a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT