R v Crewe (Earl)ex parte Sekgome
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1910 |
| Year | 1910 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
32 cases
-
Ffrost v Stevenson (1937) 58 CLR 528
...were not a British possession and the Order in Council were properly made. [DIXON J referred to R v Crewe (Earl); Ex parte Sekgome 9 (1910) 2 KB 576.] The Commonwealth was in occupation of the Territory at the date of the passing of the New Guinea Act, and under the mandate, which was given......
- Attorney General v Nissan
-
Attorney General v Nissan
...that outside British Dominions the rights of a British subject might be different from the rights of an alien—e.g. in R. v. Crewe [1910] 2 K.B. 576 at page 607. But I would not attach much importance to 18Until very recently there appears to have been no text book authority for the proposi......
- Nyali Ltd v Attorney General
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
The International Development Act, 2002: Benign Imperialism or a Missed Opportunity?
...be issued by the British courts both to a colony and a protectorate. This moreor less set aside the old case of RvCrewe ex parte Sekgome [1910] 2 KB 576 which determinedthat the detention of a resident native by the executive government of a Protectorate was an Act ofState that neither a lo......
-
Laboratories of Statehood: Legal Intervention in Colonial Africa and Today
...Powers and Jurisdiction of the British Crown (London: Frowde andStevens, 1894) 207.29 ibid, 224–225; RvCrewe (Earl), ex p Segkome [1910] 2 KB 576, 626.30 Westlake, n 19 above 183.31 Joseph Chamberlain, Secretary of State for the Colonies, told the House of Commons on 22August 1895:‘I regard......