R v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, ex parte Cook (Rene Florence)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 18 December 1995 |
| Date | 18 December 1995 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
26 cases
-
Curtis v London Rent Assessment Committee
...must condescend to "the principal important controversial issues".See also R. v. Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, ex p. Cook [1996] 1 WLR 1037, CA, per Aldous LJ at 1044F-1045E and per Hobhouse LJ at 23 See Metropolitan Properties Company (FGC) Limited v. Lannon [1969] 1 QB 577, CA, pe......
-
Jane Margaret Mordue v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Others
...in their reasons that the conclusion has been reached by an appropriate process of reasoning from the facts": R v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board ex p Cook [1996] 1 WLR 1037 at pp 1043, 1045, 1046; see also per Hobhouse LJ at p1051. 46 Save Britain's Heritage supra was a case directl......
-
In Petition Of L.c. V. For Judicial Review Of Decisions Of The Criminal Injuries Compensation Board
...was discussed, but submitted that it set too low a standard. That case was R v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board ex parte Cook, [1996] 1 WLR 1037, in which Aldous LJ said (at 1043C): "... the board's reasons should contain sufficient detail to enable the reader to know what conclusion ha......
-
The Queen and Another (Claimant(Applicant) Special Adjudicator Defendant(Respondent)
...conclusion arrived at in the course of the decision. As was said in Reg. v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, ex parte Cook [1996] 1 W.L.R. 1037, the reasons should contain sufficient detail to enable the reader to know what conclusion has been reached on the principal important issue or......
Request a trial to view additional results