R v Cunningham
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Criminal Appeal |
| Year | 1957 |
| Date | 1957 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
85 cases
- R v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, ex parte Clowes
-
R v Mowatt
...case of this kind to give to the jury express instructions upon the meaning of the word "maliciously" such as those as are discussed in R.v. Cunningham, (1957, 2 Q.B., 396). "Unlawfully and maliciously" was a fashionable phrase of Parliamentary draftsmen in 1861. It runs as a theme with min......
-
R v Cato
...Mr. Blom-Cooper says that "maliciously" requires some foresight into the consequences, and he has referred us to the case of Regina v. Cunningham, (1957) 2 Queen's Bench at page 396, which is put before us as authority for that proposition. 48 It was a rather unusual case. The prisoner had ......
-
Jordan Thompson v R
...what he had done would cause harm, or if he did not know whether it would, was reckless in that he did it anyway. Counsel relied on R v Roy Cunningham [1957] 2 All ER 412 R, 155 for the interpretation of malice. Counsel also contended that malice could be inferred from the fact that the app......
Get Started for Free
21 books & journal articles
-
Proving Consent in Sexual Cases: Legislative Change and Cultural Evolution
...evidence admissible under s. 101(1)(d) or s. 101(1)(g), andnot to evidence admitted under s. 101(1)(f).171 Whether under R v Cunningham [1957] 2 QB 396 or R v Caldwell [1981] 1 All ER 961, appliedin R v Pigg [1982] 2 All ER 591.172 [ 1976] AC 182.173 Home Off ice, above n. 8 at 14.174 A. J.......
-
Recklessness—The Continuing Search for a Definition
...of Teesside; e-mail: C.Crosby@tees.ac.uk.1 [2003] UKHL 50, [2004] 4 All ER 765.2 Advertent and subjective recklessness in Rv Cunningham [1957] 2 QB 396;objective recklessness including inadvertence in Commissioner of Police for theMetropolis v Caldwell [1982] AC 341; and the subjective test......
-
Master or Servant: A Corporation's Liability for the Activities of a Ship's Master
...above n. 39 at 351.84 (1925) 19 Cr App R 8.85 Ibid. at 11.86 Simester and Sullivan, above n. 70 at 267.87 R v Cunningham [1957] 2 QB 396.A Corporation’s Liability for the Activities of a Ship’s policies and practices were at fault. The major problem with this ap-proach is determining whethe......
-
Being Informed: The Complexities of Knowledge, Deception and Consent When Transmitting HIV
...isnecessary for a s. 20 conviction, requiring the defendant to see that he may inflictsome bodily harm on the victim: see R vCunningham [1957] 2 QB 396 and R vMowatt [1968] 1 QB 421, affirmed by Lord Ackner in R v Savage and Parmenter[1992] 1 AC 699 at 721.2R vKonzani [2005] 2 Cr App R 19......
Get Started for Free
