R v Dhillon (Sukhbir)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Neutral Citation | [2010] EWCA Crim 1577 |
| Date | 2010 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
35 cases
-
Maureen Peters Appellant v The Queen Respondent
...at the conclusion. R v Durant [1972] 1 WLR 1612. In other words there is no rational explanation to justify the jury's conclusion. R v Dhillon. It does not inexorably follow that verdicts are logically inconsistent just because they all depended on the evidence of the same person. The exis......
-
Amarjit Singh S v R
...of law, which prior to this hearing Miss Lucking did not criticise. Ultimately we have come to the conclusion that they are unsafe. 22 R v Dhillon [2011] 2 Cr App R 10 conveniently identifies the principles to be deduced from the long line of authorities in respect of alleged inconsistent......
-
Beres Douglas v R
... ... In relying on R v Cross [2009] EWCA Crim 1553 , R v Dhillon [2010] EWCA Crim 1577 and R v Harrison [1994] Crim LR 859 , Miss Exell argued that the only distinguishing feature in the instant case in respect ... ...
-
B (Sc12/2013) v R
...24 At [18]. 25 See below at [74] of the majority judgment. 26 R v Lewis [2010] EWCA Crim 496, [2010] Crim LR 870. 27 R v Dhillon [2010] EWCA Crim 1577, [2011] 2 Cr App R 28 See below at [108] of the majority judgment. 29 The direction in its current form is found in R v Accused (CA87/88) ......
Request a trial to view additional results