R v Dickson (William Ewing Nichol)
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1991 |
Year | 1991 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
Re Euro Bank Corporation
...BCC 774. (16) Oak Pits Colliery Co., In reELR(1882), 21 Ch. D. 322; 51 L.J. Ch. 768, dicta of Lindley, L.J. applied. (17) R. v. Dickson, [1991] BCC 719; (1991), 94 Cr. App. R. 7, followed. (18) R. v. Eldermire, 2000 CILR 97; on appeal, sub nom. Att. Gen. v. Eldermire, 2000 N–10, considered.......
-
Att Gen v Euro Bank Corporation
...(7) Metcalfe, In re, English Court of Appeal, Crim. App. No. 199905420/24, May 18th, 2001, unreported, followed. (8) R. v. Dickson, [1991] BCC 719; (1991), 94 Cr. App. R. 7, followed. (9) Rhondda Waste Disposal Ltd., In reELR, [2001] Ch. 57; sub nom. Environment Agency v. Clark (Admor. of R......
-
DPP v Hegarty
...constitutional rights - R v Donald [1986] 83 Cr App R 49, People (DPP) v Roseberry Construction Ltd [2003] 4 IR 338, R v Dickson [1991] BCC 719, R v Cogan [1976] QB 217, A v Governor of Arbour Hill Prison [2006] IESC 45, [2006] 4 IR 88 and Cahill v Sutton [1980] IR 269 considered - Compet......
-
The Financial Conduct Authority v Carillion Plc ((in Liquidation))
...leave under either s.130(2), s.11(3)(d) or para. 43(6) of Schedule B1 to the Act, including: (1) Criminal proceedings – see R v Dickson [1991] BCC 719 for s.130(2); and Re Rhondda Waste Disposal Ltd [2001] Ch 57 for s.11(3)(d); (2) Proceedings brought by foreign public prosecutors — see Re......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Irish Judiciary Supports Effective Enforcement Of Competition Law
...Reference was made to R v Donald [1986] 83 Cr. App. R. 49, the wording of s.4(1) of the Criminal Law Act 1967 and R v Dickson [1991] B.C.C. 719 to illustrate that the structure and parameters of the statutory provisions in Mr Hegarty's case are not unusual. Judge McKechnie noted, however, t......