R v Diggin

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1981
Year1981
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 cases
  • John Grey T/A Citytax v City and County of Swansea
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 27 June 2013
    ...was sufficient, this could have been done by leaving out the word "carried". 26 In the third of the cases to which we were referred, R v Diggin [1981] 72 Cr App R 204, the court followed Miller in holding that "carried" in this context implies some movement. I think it unnecessary to deal w......
  • Sharaz Sarfraz (A protected party suing by his brother and litigation friend Mohammed Sharbarz Sarfraz) v Shakeeb Akhtar
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 6 April 2020
    ...that the words “unlawfully taken” in s.151(4) must be construed consistently with the offence under s.12. Relying on R v. Diggin (1980) 72 Cr. App. R. 204 (CA), he argued that the offence, and therefore any unlawful taking under s.151(4), is only committed when the car actually 22 In McMinn......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT