R v Director of Serious Fraud Office, ex parte Smith
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Judgment Date | 11 June 1992 |
| Date | 11 June 1992 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
92 cases
-
Dunnes Stores Ireland Company v Ryan
...ACT 2001 S29(8) CONSTITUTION ART 40.6.1(1) HEANEY V IRELAND & AG 1996 1 IR 580 R V DIRECTOR OF SERIOUS FRAUD OFFICER EX PARTE SMITH 1993 AC 1CONSTITUTION ART 38 HEANEY V IRELAND 1994 3 IR 607 TIMES NEWSPAPERS LTD V UK 1979 2 EHRR 245 BANKRUPTCY ACT 1998 S21(4) COMPTROLLER & AUDITOR GENERAL......
- Re Arrows Ltd (No 2)
- R v Hertfordshire County Council, ex parte Green Environmental Industries Ltd and another
-
Ferreira v Levin NO and Others; Vryenhoek and Others v Powell NO and Others
...570 R v Collins (1987) 38 DLR (4th) 508 (SCC) H R v Corbett (1988) 42 CCC (3rd) 385 R v Director of Serious Fraud Office; Ex parte Smith [1993] AC 1 (HL) ([1992] 3 All ER 456) R v Edwards Books and Art Ltd (1986) 35 DLR (4th) 1 (SCC) ((1986) 2 SCR 713) R v Harris (Richard) and Another [1970......
Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
-
Ireland: Curtailment of the right to silence through statutory adverse inferences
...s 35(4).8. Declan McGrath, Evidence (2nd edn, Thomson Round Hall 2014) 847. See also R v Director of Serious Fraud Office, exparte Smith [1993] AC 1, 32; [1992] 3 All ER 456, 465 (Lord Mustill) and Heaney v Ireland [1996] 1 IR 580, 589; [1997]1 ILRM 117, 126 (O’Flaherty J).9. State (McCart......
-
American Perspectives on Self-Incrimination and the Compelled Production of Evidence
...of punishment along with the right of the accused not to take the witness stand at trial. Smith v Dfrector ofSertous Fraud Oflce [1992] 3 All ER 456. An American perspective on the right to silence is presented in M. Berger. ‘Rethinking Self- Incrimination in Great Britain’. 61 Den LJ 507 (......
-
Comment: The right to pre-trial silence: S v Thebus 2003 (2) SACR 319 (CC)
...drawn from the silence of an accused. They referred to Lord Mustill's decision in R v Director of Serious Fraud Offences, Ex parte Smith [1993] AC 1(HL) at 30E-31B where it was stated that the right to silence is best understood as not denoting a single right, but to a disparate group of im......
-
The Fame, Fortunes and Future of the ‘Rump of the Common Law’: Conspiracy to Defraud and English Law (Part 1)
...offencewhich17 Weinberg.aboven. 14, 156.18 D. Campbell.'CautionEnds Right to Silence' The Guardian Weekly. 28 August 1994,11.19 (1992) 95 Cr App R 191.20 (1988) 34 A Crim R 49(Courtof Criminal Appeal. Western Australia).21 Ibid. at 118.22 Ibid.23 Ibid.24 Carter'1995)86 A Crim R 17 at 19, pe......
