R v Docherty

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Year1999
Date1999

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
20 cases
  • R v Jason Roger Wilson
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 16 January 2008
    ...by jurors, that test ought to be applied on the basis of the most damaging reasonable interpretation. For that see R v Docherty [1999] 1 Cr App R 274. 14 As to those principles, the judge directed himself correctly. The question for us is whether he nevertheless got it plainly wrong and arr......
  • R v Bakish Alla Khan ; R v Lewthwaite
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 14 March 2008
    ...of the jury or juror, or the quashing of a conviction if it comes to light after the trial. – R v Box [1964] 1 QB 430; R v Docherty [1999] 1 Cr App R 274. In the latter case Roch LJ, giving judgment of the court, after referring to R v Gough, said that the ultimate question for the court wa......
  • Evanson Mitcham v The Queen
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 16 March 2009
    ...could be that they took them as referring to threats made by the appellant against a witness or witnesses. In so submitting he relied on R v Docherty [1999] 1 Cr App R 274, a case of indecent assault in which a witness had made a reference to the defendant's having been in prison. The tria......
  • Raphael v R
    • Bahamas
    • Court of Appeal (Bahamas)
    • 13 December 2016
    ...v. H.M. Advocate 1946 S.C.(J.) 37 mentioned Arthurton v. Queen [2004] UKPC 25 mentioned Mitcham v. Queen [2009] UKPC 5 mentioned R v. Docherty [1999] 1 Cr App R 274 mentioned R v. Rowton [1865] Le & Ca 520 mentioned R v. Sims [1946] KB 531 mentioned R v. Taylor and Evans SCCrApp No.......
  • Get Started for Free