R v Docherty
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1999 |
| Year | 1999 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
23 cases
-
R v Jason Roger Wilson
...interpretation by jurors, that test ought to be applied on the basis of the most damaging reasonable interpretation. For that see R v Docherty [1999] 1 Cr App R 14 As to those principles, the judge directed himself correctly. The question for us is whether he nevertheless got it plainly wr......
-
Magee’s (Michael Gerard) Application
...to legal advice, this court as an appellate tribunal has now to exercise the discretion conferred on him: see, eg, R v Docherty [1999] 1 Cr App R 274 at 281. If the law applying in 1990 had remained unchanged to the present time, we should be bound to reach the same conclusion that we could......
-
R v Bakish Alla Khan ; R v Lewthwaite
...the discharge of the jury or juror, or the quashing of a conviction if it comes to light after the trial. – R v Box [1964] 1 QB 430; R v Docherty [1999] 1 Cr App R 274. In the latter case Roch LJ, giving judgment of the court, after referring to R v Gough, said that the ultimate question ......
-
Kennedy, Brian: In the matter of an application by Brian Kennedy, Philip Magee, Brian G McCartney, John Coyle, Patricia Smyth, Barry J Macdonald, Seamus Treacy, Kieran Mallon and Karen Quinlivan for Judicial Review
...to legal advice, this court as an appellate tribunal has now to exercise the discretion conferred on him: see, eg, R v Docherty [1999] 1 Cr App R 274 at 281. If the law applying in 1990 had remained 19 unchanged to the present time, we should be bound to reach the same conclusion that we co......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Judicial Management of Juror Impropriety
...stated that in such circumstances the judge should approach 101 [2011] EWCA Crim 2651.102 Ibid. at [20].103 [1991] Crim LR 717.104 (1999) 1 Cr App R 274; see also R v Lawson [2005] EWCA Crim 84, [2007] 1 Cr App R The Journal of Criminal Law60the issue on the basis of the most prejudicial me......