R v Effik ; R v Mitchell

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date21 July 1994
Date21 July 1994
CourtHouse of Lords
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
26 cases
  • R v Governor of Belmarsh Prison, ex parte Martin
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 21 October 1994
    ...general proposition he relied on R v Preston and Others (1994) Crim. App. R 405, and on a passage in the speech of Lord Oliver in R v Effik and Another [1994] 3 WLR 583 at 591H: "It is concerned only with authorising tapping into the public system. A more reliable guide to construction is, ......
  • R v Owen ; R v Stephen
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 6 November 1998
    ... ... 31 The authorities ... 32 We turn first to a case decided in 1992, Effik 95 Cr App R 427 ... In that case the appellants were convicted of a number of offences of conspiracy to supply prohibited drugs. Evidence was adduced ... ...
  • R v Effik ; R v Mitchell
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 19 March 1992
  • R v P (Telephone Intercepts: Admissibility of Evidence)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 11 December 2000
    ... ... Their appeals failed ... 57 There had been an earlier decision of the Court of Appeal in R v Effik (1992) 95 Cr App R 427 which had in effect held that intercept evidence was admissible in criminal trials, giving a restricted interpretation to ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Intercepting Communications ‘In Accordance with the Law’
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 76-2, April 2012
    • 1 April 2012
    ...Act 1984. In Rv Ahmed,16 telephone calls made bya co-defendant from the police station payphone were intercepted after15 [1995] 1 AC 309.16 [1995] Crim LR 246.The Journal of Criminal the police became suspicious of the number of calls made. The courtobserved that for an offence to be commit......
  • Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, Part I: Meaning of ‘Interception’
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 69-2, April 2005
    • 1 April 2005
    ...at the same time as the accused’s words were beingtransmitted’. This was consistent with the decision of the House of Lordsin Rv Eff‌ick [1995] 1 AC 309. Consideration of this approach demon-strates that the difference between when a communication is inter-cepted during the course of its tr......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT