R v Electricity Comrs.ex parte London Electricity Joint Committee Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Year | 1924 |
| Date | 1924 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
225 cases
-
Harper v Secretary of State for the Home Department
...Justice Harman. 28 Sir Andrew referred us to one or two cases, and upon those I ought to say one or two words. In the case of The King v. Electricity Commissioners, reported in 1924, 1 King's Bench Division, page 171, the Court granted a writ of prohibition or mandamus against the Electrici......
- OSK & Partners Sdn v Tengku Noone Aziz and Another
- Singapore Improvement Ordinance (1927), an application for a writ of prohibition and
- Oriental Rubber and Oil Palms Sdn Bhd v Pemungut Hasil Tanah, Kuantan
Get Started for Free
8 books & journal articles
-
Preliminary Sections
...Domingo (1963) 1 All N.L.R. 81. 212 R. v. Duffy (1949) All E.R. 932n 31 R. v. Eagleton, Dears 515 125 R. v. Electricity Commissioners (1924) 1 K.B. 171, 204-205. 623 R. v. Enweonye (1955) 15 WA CA 1 599 R. v. Gail 30 Cr. App. R. 81 212 R. v. Golder and Ors. (1960) 3 AER 475. 158 R. v. Harry......
-
‘Australian Exceptionalism’ in Judicial Review
...17; Geoffrey Lewis, Lord Atkin (1983) 1–3. His father, Robert Travers Atkin, was a Member of the Queensland Legislative Assembly. 118 [1924] 1 KB 171, 205 ('Electricity Commissioners Case'). 119 The misunderstanding is explained by Lord Reid in Ridge v Baldwin [1964] AC 40, 72, 74–6. Sir An......
-
HART V. MILITARY GOVERNOR, RIVERS STATE & ORS.
...Ch. 388 (C.A.). 9. Reg V. Gaming Board for Great Britain, Ex-Parte Benaim & Khaida (1970) 2 Q.B. 417. 10.R v. Electricity Commissioners (1924) 1 K.B. 171, 204-205. 50 11.R v. Boycott & Ors. Ex-Parte Keasley (1939) 2 K.B. 651. 12.R. v. Minister of Health Ex-Parte Yaffe (1930) 2 K.B. 98. Mr. ......
-
The Boundaries of Judicial Review Since Highwood Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses v. Wall.
...AC 120, 1 KB 160 (HL (Eng)); R v Electricity Commissioners, Ex parte London Electricity Joint Committee Co Ltd, [1923] All ER 250, [1924] 1 KB 171 (50.) See e.g. Ridge v Baldwin, [1962] 1 All ER 834, [1964] AC 40 (CA); R v Liverpool Corporation, Ex parte Liverpool Taxi Fleet Operators' Asso......
Get Started for Free
