R v Essex Justices, ex parte Final
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1962 |
| Date | 1962 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
20 cases
-
Steward v DPP
...He submits that by the utterance "no case to answer" the information was dismissed. In support of this submission he refers to R v Essex Justices ex parte Final [1963] 2 QB 816. In that case, having heard the evidence and retired to consider it, the magistrates returned and announced that t......
- Griffiths v Boral Resources (Qld) Pty Ltd
-
Junkanoo Estates Ltd v UBS (Bahamas) Ltd (in Voluntary Liquidation)
...al [Unreported] 2010/CLE/gen/001673 mentioned R v. Camberwell Green Magistrates' Court ex parte Brown (1983) 4 FLR 767 considered R v. Essex Justices ex p Final (1962) 3 All ER 924 mentioned R v. Norfolk Justices, ex parte Director of Public Prosecutions [1950] 2 KB 558 considered Re 56 D......
-
Verderers of the New Forest v Andrew Young, Austin Walter Young and Others (No 2)
...have interrupted immediately or waited until the end. This is not a case like the Essex Justices case [that is a reference to R v Essex Justices ex parte Final [1963] 2 QB 816] where a Bench was persuaded to re-open the case and, in effect, hear further submissions as to the evidence. It is......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...DC! 131 ..................................................... Essen v DPP [2005] EWHC 1077 (Admin), DC! 540 Essex JJ, R v, ex p Final [1963] 2 QB 816, [1963] 2 WLR 38, ................................................................................. ! [1963] 3 All ER 924, DC! 587 ................
-
Other Issues
...which the justices were entitled to convict the defendant. Held: “ [on 1.] … This is not a case like [ R v Essex Justices ex parte Final [1963] 2 QB 816] where a Bench was persuaded to re-open the case and, in effect, hear further submissions as to the evidence. It is a case of an error hav......