R v Field
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 10 December 1992 |
| Date | 10 December 1992 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
R v Samtoch Mandair
... ... The appeal came on before another Division of this court on 18 February 1993. Nolan LJ, giving the judgment of the court, set out the history of the matter and said: "…. a closer examination of the legal issues in the light of the decision of this court in the case of R v Field which was delivered on 10 December 1992, has produced a further and simpler ground of appeal which we gave the appellant leave to add at the beginning of the hearing before us. It relates to the form of the indictment and to the terms in which the verdict of the jury was delivered." ... ...
-
R v BR (Sentencing: Extended Licences
... ... Secondly, the relevant leading case in the European Court of Human Rights is Welch v UK (1995) 20 EHRR 247 ... The criteria for determining whether an order is a penalty, distilled from that case, were set out by this court in R v Field and Young [2002] EWCA Crim 2913 ... i) The starting point is whether the measure is imposed following a criminal conviction (see paragraphs 28 and 29 of the judgment of the ECtHR); ii) The nature and purpose of the measure are also relevant (see paragraphs 28 and 30); ... ...
-
R (R) v Durham Constabulary and Another
... ... That challenge was upheld by the Queen's Bench Divisional Court (Latham LJ and Field J: [2002] EWHC 2486 (Admin); [2003] 1 WLR 897 ), which accordingly quashed the decision to warn the appellant. The Chief Constable of the Durham Constabulary and the Secretary of State for the Home Department contend that that decision was wrong in law ... 2 The age ... ...
-
R v Lahaye (Dean John)
... ... The effect of the decisions of the House of Lords in R v Wilson [1984] AC 242 and R v Mandair [1995] 1 AC 208 has deprived a number of earlier decisions, such as R v Springfield (1969) 83 Cr App R 608 , R v McCready [1978] 1 WLR 1376 and R v Field (1997) 97 Cr App R 357 , of any continuing authority in this area. In summary, section 6(3) of the 1967 Act enables a defendant to be convicted of an offence contrary to section 20 of the 1861 Act as an alternative to a charge and single count alleging contravention of section 18 ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results