R v Firth
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1938 |
| Year | 1938 |
| Court | Court of Criminal Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
19 cases
-
Stirland v DPP
...of that Court in R. v. Wattam, 28 Crim. A.R. 80, where the present Lord Chief Justice quoted the observation of Lord Hewart L.C.J. in R. v. Firth, 26 Crim. A.R. 148, and treated that observation as amounting to a ruling that a conviction cannot be quashed on the ground of the improper admis......
-
Jonathan Armbrister v R
...& CAIS No. 172 of 2013 mentioned R v Clarke and another [2008] 2 All ER 665 considered R v Featherstone [1942] 2 All ER 672 mentioned R v Firth [1938] 3 All ER 783 considered R v Gray [1995] 2 Cr App Rep 100 mentioned R v Leeks [2009] EWCA Crim 1612 applied R v Morais [1988] 3 All ER 1......
-
Armbrister v R
...CAIS No. 172 of 2013 mentioned R v Clarke and Another [2008] 2 All ER 665 considered R v Featherstone [1942] 2 All ER 672 mentioned R v Firth [1938] 3 All ER 783 considered R v Gray [1995] 2 Cr App Rep 100 mentioned R v Leeks [2009] EWCA Crim 1612 applied R v Morais [1988] 3 Al......
- McConney and Mohammed v R
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
OPEN JUSTICE, 'BACK-TO-BACK' TRIALS AND JUROR PREJUDICE: EXAMINING THE SUPPRESSION ORDER IN THE TRIAL OF GEORGE PELL.
...VR 469, 473 (Winneke CJ for the Court) ('Knape'); R v Peckham [1935] All ER Rep 173, 174 (Lord Hewart CJ for the Court); R v Firth [1938] 3 All ER 783, 786 (Lord Hewart CJ for the Court). However, where prior convictions are revealed in evidence in court for a legitimate purpose, directions......