R v Forest of Dean Justices, ex parte Farley
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 11 April 1990 |
| Date | 11 April 1990 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
8 cases
-
R v Phipps (James Michael)
...DPP [1964] AC 1254 and R v Beedie (1987) 2 Cr App R 176. In the particular circumstances of this case he also relies upon R v Forest of Dean Justices, ex parte Farley [1990] RTR 228 and this passage in Archbold 2005 at paragraph 32–29: " Order of trials where there is an excess alcohol char......
-
R v Arnold (Louise) ; R v LSA
... ... which in turn says that it is based upon R v Forest of Dean Justices, ex p Farley [1990] RTR 228 ... The Crown ... ...
-
R v Arnold (Louise) ; R v LSA
...Criminal Pleading, Evidence and Practice 2007, which in turn says that it is based upon R v Forest of Dean Justices, Ex p Farley [1990] RTR 228. The Crown wishes to submit on appeal that both those rulings were 3 The Crown case, put shortly, is that the defendant attended a party at the qua......
-
DPP v Alexander
...78 of PACE. 31 (f) I do not consider that the position in this case is analogous to that in Phipps [2008] EWCA Crim 33 or ex parte Farley [1990] RTR 228, where successive prosecutions were brought on closely related subject matter. 32 (g) It is to be noted that the case stated does not appe......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Divisional Court
...in, and time at,which they are preferred are obviously matters of vital importanceto the defendant. In R v ForestofDean JJ, ex pFarley[1990]RTR228, the applicant for judicial review had consumed alcoholand, in driving a vehicle on a road, had failed to negotiate abendand thus overturned the......