R v G
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Neutral Citation | [2004] EWCA Crim 1240 |
| Date | 2004 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Gouldbourne v R
...1 All E.R. 402; (1940), 38 L.G.R. 155; 27 Cr. App. R. 168; 104 J.P. 181; 31 Cox, C.C. 391; 162 L.T. 407, considered. (7) R. v. G, [2004] 2 Cr. App. R. 38; [2004] EWCA Crim 1240, applied. (8) R. v. Harris, [2006] 1 Cr. App. R. 5; [2008] 2 F.L.R. 412; (2005), 85 B.M.L.R. 75; [2005] EWCA Crim ......
-
Kiari Tucker v The Queen
...He observed that gait comparison evidence had been accepted by previous courts, as demonstrated in the English Court of Appeal decisions of R v Otway [2011] EWCA Crim 3; and R v Ferdinand [2014] EWCA Crim 1243. Mr Francis, a consultant podiatric surgeon for over 25 years, had given eviden......
-
R v Robert Jackson
...Counsel for the Crown. Clinton O. Clarke for the respondent. Cases: R v. Silverlock [1894] 2 Q.B. 776 – R v. Bonython (1984) 38 S.A.S.R 45 – R v. G [2004] 2 Cr. App. R. 38 – Narine Sooklal and another v. The State [1999] U.K.P.C. 37 – Randall v. R [2002] U.K.P.C. 19 Legislation: Section 7......
-
Lisiate v R
...so. 26 On appeal for Mr Lisiate, Mr Duff submitted that these directions were erroneous because, contrary to the decision of this Court in R v Hira, they merely repeated the language of s 66(1)(d) and failed to place the key issues before the jury. 27 We do not accept these submissions. Fir......
Request a trial to view additional results