R v Gee; R v Bibby; R v Dunscombe
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1936 |
| Date | 1936 |
| Year | 1936 |
| Court | Court of Criminal Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
63 cases
-
R v Wrench
...Act. 49 Mr Cooper submits, nevertheless, that this Court has an inherent jurisdiction to quash the indictment as a nullity relying on R. v. Gee and Others [1936] 2 K.B. 442. In that case this Court held that the proceedings before the committing Justices were so defective by reason of non-c......
-
R v Perez
...1 W.L.R. 338; [2008] 2 All E.R. 665; [2008] 2 Cr. App. R. 18; [2008] Crim. L.R. 551; [2008] UKHL 8, distinguished. (2) R. v. Gee, [1936] 2 K.B. 442; (1936), 25 Cr. App. R. 198; [1936] 2 All E.R. 89, not followed. (3) R. v. MungaribiFLR(1988), 92 FLR 264; 55 NTR 12, referred to. (4) R. v. Ph......
- R v Walker (Thomas Schofield)
- R v Maharaj; and other appeals
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
The Technical Aspects of Technicality: A Slightly Whimsical Inquiry into What Makes a Rule of Evidence or Procedure ‘Technical’
...the legis-154 THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE & PROOFWHAT MAKES A RULE OF EVIDENCE OR PROCEDURE ‘TECHNICAL’19 See, e.g., RvGee (1936) 25 Cr App R 198, where committal proceedings were heldto be defective; theconsequence was that the defendant was not validly committed for trial, the p......
-
MISTRIAL
...in law these has been no trial at all: See: Crane v. D.P.P. 15 Cr. App. R. 183; The State v. Lopez (1968) 1 All L.R. 356; R. v. Gee (1936) 25 Cr. App. R. 198 at p. 203." - Per Nnaemeka-Agu, J.S.C., in Okaroh v. State Suit No. S.C. 58/1989; (1990) 1 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 125) 128 at...
-
Recent Book: Harris Mark III: Criminal Jurisdiction of Magistrates
...afootnoteperhaps. On alighter note, do we really need toremembertheoddway things weredoneinOldhambefore the lastwar?See R. v. Gee [1936] 2 K.B.442. J.C.W.379 ...